Cited by 875

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Analysis of Human Disease-Associated Gene Sequences In Drosophila melanogaster

Reiter, Lawrence T., Potocki, Lorraine, Chien, Sam, Gribskov, Michael, Bier, Ethan·2001·Genome Research

Abstract

We performed a systematic BLAST analysis of 929 human disease gene entries associated with at least one mutant allele in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database against the recently completed genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster . The results of this search have been formatted as an updateable and searchable on-line database called Homophila. Our analysis identified 714 distinct human disease genes (77% of disease genes searched) matching 548 unique Drosophila sequences, which we have summarized by disease category. This breakdown into disease classes creates a picture of disease genes that are amenable to study using Drosophila as the model organism. Of the 548 Drosophila genes related to human disease genes, 153 are associated with known mutant alleles and 56 more are tagged by P -element insertions in or near the gene. Examples of how to use the database to identify Drosophila genes related to human disease genes are presented. We anticipate that cross-genomic analysis of human disease genes using the power of Drosophila second-site modifier screens will promote interaction between human and Drosophila research groups, accelerating the understanding of the pathogenesis of human genetic disease. The Homophila database is available at http://homophila.sdsc.edu .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.169101

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01939-3 · DOI
  3. Fortini, 2000, A survey of human disease gene counterparts in the Drosophila genome., J. Cell. Biol., 150, F23, 10.1083/jcb.150.2.F23 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/ng0197-36 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81135-6 · DOI
  6. McKusick, V.A. 2000. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM. ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim/.
  7. 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01878-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.288.5473.2013 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1996)18:1<1::AID-DVG1>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
  10. Scriver C.R. (1995) The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease (McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, New York, NY), 7th ed..
  11. 10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80081-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 875

Metadata

Authors
Reiter, L. T., Potocki, L., Chien, S., Gribskov, M., & Bier, E.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
1114-1125
ISSN
  • 1088-9051
  • 1549-5469
Cited by
875
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Analysis of Human Disease-Associated Gene Sequences In Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.169101
The paper
Reiter, L. T., Potocki, L., Chien, S., Gribskov, M., & Bier, E. (2001). A Systematic Analysis of Human Disease-Associated Gene Sequences In Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.169101