Cited by 248Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Phylogenetic analysis of ribonuclease H domains suggests a late, chimeric origin of LTR retrotransposable elements and retroviruses

Open access
Malik, Harmit S., Eickbush, Thomas H.·2001·Genome Research

Abstract

We have conducted a phylogenetic analysis of the Ribonuclease HI (RNH) domains present in Eubacteria, Eukarya, all long-term repeat (LTR)-bearing retrotransposons, and several late-branching clades of non-LTR retrotransposons. Analysis of this simple yet highly conserved enzymatic domain from these disparate sources provides surprising insights into the evolution of eukaryotic retrotransposons. First, it indicates that the lineage of elements leading to vertebrate retroviruses acquired a new RNH domain either from non-LTR retrotransposons or from a eukaryotic host genome. The preexisting retroviral RNH domain degenerated to become the tether (connection) domain of the reverse transcriptase (RT)–RNH complex. Second, it indicates that all LTR retrotransposons arose in eukaryotes well after the origin of the non-LTR retrotransposons. Because of the younger age of the LTR retrotransposons, their complex structure, and the absence of any prokaryotic precursors, we propose that the LTR retrotransposons originated as a fusion between a DNA-mediated transposon and a non-LTR retrotransposon. The resulting two-step mechanism of LTR retrotransposition, in which RNA is reverse transcribed away from the chromosomal target site, rather than directly onto the target site, was probably an adaptation to the uncoupling of transcription and translation in eukaryotic cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.185101

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ribonuclease H belongs to the retroviral integrase superfamily.

    “Structurally, RNH belongs to the retroviral integrase superfamily [19,23,24]”

    From Retroviral RNase H: structure, mechanism, and inhibition (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    The section on vertebrate retroviruses reacquiring their RNH domain describes a structural fold and catalytic features shared by RNH and retroviral integrases. It does not classify RNH as a member of a retroviral integrase superfamily, so the structural connection is supported but the stated membership is not. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The connection, ribonuclease H, and integrase domains share a similar RNH-like fold consisting of a five-stranded beta-sheet with alpha-helices.

    “the connection, RNH, and IN domains that are encoded in retroviral Pol (Figure 1a) share a similar RNH-like fold, a five stranded β–sheet with α–helices [19,23,24]”

    From Retroviral RNase H: structure, mechanism, and inhibition (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The active-site histidine is not conserved in LTR retrotransposons.

    “Interestingly, the His residue is not conserved in the LTR retrotransposons [19].”

    From Retroviral RNase H: structure, mechanism, and inhibition (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]22. Eickbush, T.H. 1994. Origin and evolutionary relationships of retroelements. In The Evolutionary Biology of Viruses (ed. S.S. Morse), pp. 121-157. Raven Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malik, H. S., & Eickbush, T. H.
Affiliations
Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
1187-1197
ISSN
  • 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5469
OpenAlex
W2166752015
Cited by
248
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9974606, GM-29009)
  • Helen Hay Whitney Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (MCB-9974606, 5r01gm029009-21, GM29009)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM29009)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
LTR retrotransposons, non-LTR retrotransposons, retroviral evolution, reverse transcriptase, phylogenetic analysis
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Retroviridae, Viral Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Ribonuclease H, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Retroelements, Terminal Repeat Sequences, Catalytic Domain, Amino Acid Motifs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review