The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Segmental Duplications: Organization and Impact Within the Current Human Genome Project Assembly
Open accessAbstract
Segmental duplications play fundamental roles in both genomic disease and gene evolution. To understand their organization within the human genome, we have developed the computational tools and methods necessary to detect identity between long stretches of genomic sequence despite the presence of high copy repeats and large insertion-deletions. Here we present our analysis of the most recent genome assembly (January 2001) in which we focus on the global organization of these segments and the role they play in the whole-genome assembly process. Initially, we considered only large recent duplication events that fell well-below levels of draft sequencing error (alignments 90%–98% similar and ≥1 kb in length). Duplications (90%–98%; ≥1 kb) comprise 3.6% of all human sequence. These duplications show clustering and up to 10-fold enrichment within pericentromeric and subtelomeric regions. In terms of assembly, duplicated sequences were found to be over-represented in unordered and unassigned contigs indicating that duplicated sequences are difficult to assign to their proper position. To assess coverage of these regions within the genome, we selected BACs containing interchromosomal duplications and characterized their duplication pattern by FISH. Only 47% (106/224) of chromosomes positive by FISH had a corresponding chromosomal position by BLAST comparison. We present data that indicate that this is attributable to misassembly, misassignment, and/or decreased sequencing coverage within duplicated regions. Surprisingly, if we consider putative duplications >98% identity, we identify 10.6% (286 Mb) of the current assembly as paralogous. The majority of these alignments, we believe, represent unmerged overlaps within unique regions. Taken together the above data indicate that segmental duplications represent a significant impediment to accurate human genome assembly, requiring the development of specialized techniques to finish these exceptional regions of the genome. The identification and characterization of these highly duplicated regions represents an important step in the complete sequencing of a human reference genome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
Self-citationThe DNA sequence of human chromosome 21
Hattori, M., Fujiyama, A., Taylor, T. D., Watanabe, H., Yada, T., Park, H.-S., Toyoda, A., Ishii, K., Totoki, Y., Choi, D.-K., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012518 · Cited by 1,474
Optimal alignments in linear space
Myers, E. W., & Miller, W. (1988) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/4.1.11 · Cited by 1,235
The DNA sequence of human chromosome 22
Dunham, I., Hunt, A. R., Collins, J. E., Bruskiewich, R., Beare, D. M., Clamp, M., Smink, L. J., Ainscough, R., Almeida, J. P., Babbage, A., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/990031 · Cited by 1,157
Self-citationA physical map of the human genome
The International Human Genome Mapping Consortium, Washington University School of Medicine, G. S. C., McPherson, J. D., Marra, M., Hillier, L., Waterston, R. H., Chinwalla, A., Wallis, J., Sekhon, M., Wylie, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057157 · Cited by 925
Self-citationNew Goals for the U.S. Human Genome Project: 1998-2003
Collins, F. S., Patrinos, A., Jordan, E., Chakravarti, A., Gesteland, R., Walters, L., & groups, T. M. O. T. D. A. N. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.682 · Cited by 854
Characterization of the pufferfish (Fugu) genome as a compact model vertebrate genome
Brenner, S., Elgar, G., Sanford, R., Macrae, A., Venkatesh, B., & Aparicio, S. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366265a0 · Cited by 575
Shaikh, T. H. (2000) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/9.4.489 · Cited by 526
Chen, K.-S., Manian, P., Koeuth, T., Potocki, L., Zhao, Q., Chinault, A. C., Lee, C. C., & Lupski, J. R. (1997) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1097-154 · Cited by 387
Cited by
ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data
Wang, K., Li, M., & Hakonarson, H. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq603 · Cited by 14,621
A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome
Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., Maricic, T., Stenzel, U., Kircher, M., Patterson, N., Li, H., Zhai, W., Fritz, M. H.-Y., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188021 · Cited by 4,318
Self-citationStructural variation in the human genome
Feuk, L., Carson, A. R., & Scherer, S. W. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1767 · Cited by 2,034
Wang, K., Li, M., Hadley, D., Liu, R., Glessner, J., Grant, S. F. A., Hakonarson, H., & Bucan, M. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6861907 · Cited by 1,792
The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006
Hinrichs, A. S. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj144 · Cited by 1,646
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailey, J. A., Yavor, A. M., Massa, H. F., Trask, B. J., & Eichler, E. E.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2001-05-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1005-1017
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2151318268
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 36
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Segmental Duplications: Organization and Impact Within the Current Human Genome Project Assembly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.187101
- The paper
- Bailey, J. A., Yavor, A. M., Massa, H. F., Trask, B. J., & Eichler, E. E. (2001). Segmental Duplications: Organization and Impact Within the Current Human Genome Project Assembly. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.187101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.