Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parallel Genotyping of Over 10,000 SNPs Using a One-Primer Assay on a High-Density Oligonucleotide Array

Open access
Matsuzaki, Hajime, Loi, Halina, Dong, Shoulian, Tsai, Ya-Yu, Fang, Joy, Law, Jane, Di, Xiaojun, Liu, Wei-Min, Yang, Geoffrey, Liu, Guoying, Huang, Jing, Kennedy, Giulia C., Ryder, Thomas B., Marcus, Gregory A., Walsh, P. Sean, Shriver, Mark D., Puck, Jennifer M., Jones, Keith W., Mei, Rui·2004·Genome Research

Abstract

The analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is increasingly utilizedto investigate the genetic causes of complex human diseases. Here we present a high-throughput genotyping platform that uses a one-primer assay to genotype over 10,000 SNPs per individual on a single oligonucleotide array. This approach uses restriction digestion to fractionate the genome, followed by amplification of a specific fractionated subset of the genome. The resulting reduction in genome complexity enables allele-specific hybridization to the array. The selection of SNPs was primarily determined by computer-predicted lengths of restriction fragments containing the SNPs, andwas further driven by strict empirical measurements of accuracy, reproducibility, andaverage call rate, which we estimate to be >9.5%, >99.9%, and>95%, respectively. With average heterozygosity of 0.38 andgenome scan resolution of 0.31 cM, the SNP array is a viable alternative to panels of microsatellites (STRs). As a demonstration of the utility of the genotyping platform in whole-genome scans, we have replicated and refined a linkage region on chromosome 2p for chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis and thyroid disease, previously identified using a panel of microsatellite (STR) markers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.2014904

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Matsuzaki, H., Loi, H., Dong, S., Tsai, Y.-Y., Fang, J., Law, J., Di, X., Liu, W.-M., Yang, G., Liu, G., Huang, J., Kennedy, G. C., Ryder, T. B., Marcus, G. A., Walsh, P. S., Shriver, M. D., Puck, J. M., Jones, K. W., & Mei, R.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2004-03
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
414-425
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102058141
Cited by
320
References
30
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parallel Genotyping of Over 10,000 SNPs Using a One-Primer Assay on a High-Density Oligonucleotide Array. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.2014904
The paper
Matsuzaki, H., Loi, H., Dong, S., Tsai, Y.-Y., Fang, J., Law, J., Di, X., Liu, W.-M., Yang, G., Liu, G., Huang, J., Kennedy, G. C., Ryder, T. B., Marcus, G. A., Walsh, P. S., Shriver, M. D., Puck, J. M., Jones, K. W., & Mei, R. (2004). Parallel Genotyping of Over 10,000 SNPs Using a One-Primer Assay on a High-Density Oligonucleotide Array. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2014904

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.