The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reciprocal insulation analysis of Hi-C data shows that TADs represent a functionally but not structurally privileged scale in the hierarchical folding of chromosomes
Open accessAbstract
Understanding how regulatory sequences interact in the context of chromosomal architecture is a central challenge in biology. Chromosome conformation capture revealed that mammalian chromosomes possess a rich hierarchy of structural layers, from multi-megabase compartments to sub-megabase topologically associating domains (TADs) and sub-TAD contact domains. TADs appear to act as regulatory microenvironments by constraining and segregating regulatory interactions across discrete chromosomal regions. However, it is unclear whether other (or all) folding layers share similar properties, or rather TADs constitute a privileged folding scale with maximal impact on the organization of regulatory interactions. Here, we present a novel algorithm named CaTCH that identifies hierarchical trees of chromosomal domains in Hi-C maps, stratified through their reciprocal physical insulation, which is a single and biologically relevant parameter. By applying CaTCH to published Hi-C data sets, we show that previously reported folding layers appear at different insulation levels. We demonstrate that although no structurally privileged folding level exists, TADs emerge as a functionally privileged scale defined by maximal boundary enrichment in CTCF and maximal cell-type conservation. By measuring transcriptional output in embryonic stem cells and neural precursor cells, we show that the likelihood that genes in a domain are coregulated during differentiation is also maximized at the scale of TADs. Finally, we observe that regulatory sequences occur at genomic locations corresponding to optimized mutual interactions at the same scale. Our analysis suggests that the architectural functionality of TADs arises from the interplay between their ability to partition interactions and the specific genomic position of regulatory sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895
Self-citationDisruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions
Lupiáñez, D. G., Kraft, K., Heinrich, V., Krawitz, P., Brancati, F., Klopocki, E., Horn, D., Kayserili, H., Opitz, J. M., Laxova, R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004 · Cited by 2,132
Sanborn, A. L., Rao, S. S. P., Huang, S.-C., Durand, N. C., Huntley, M. H., Jewett, A. I., Bochkov, I. D., Chinnappan, D., Cutkosky, A., Li, J., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1518552112 · Cited by 1,730
Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure
Nagano, T., Lubling, Y., Stevens, T. J., Schoenfelder, S., Yaffe, E., Dean, W., Laue, E. D., Tanay, A., & Fraser, P. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12593 · Cited by 1,589
Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization
Imakaev, M., Fudenberg, G., McCord, R. P., Naumova, N., Goloborodko, A., Lajoie, B. R., Dekker, J., & Mirny, L. A. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2148 · Cited by 1,423
Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment
Phillips-Cremins, J. E., Sauria, M. E. G., Sanyal, A., Gerasimova, T. I., Lajoie, B. R., Bell, J. S. K., Ong, C.-T., Hookway, T. A., Guo, C., Sun, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053 · Cited by 1,187
CRISPR Inversion of CTCF Sites Alters Genome Topology and Enhancer/Promoter Function
Guo, Y., Xu, Q., Canzio, D., Shou, J., Li, J., Gorkin, D. U., Jung, I., Wu, H., Zhai, Y., Tang, Y., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.038 · Cited by 958
Comparative Hi-C Reveals that CTCF Underlies Evolution of Chromosomal Domain Architecture
Vietri Rudan, M., Barrington, C., Henderson, S., Ernst, C., Odom, D. T., Tanay, A., & Hadjur, S. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.004 · Cited by 680 · cited 2×
“CTCF clustering at domain boundaries has been repeatedly reported as one of the hallmarks of topological domains across species (Dixon et al. 2012; Sexton et al. 2012; Van Bortle et al. 2014; Vietri Rudan et al. 2015).”
Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications
Franke, M., Ibrahim, D. M., Andrey, G., Schwarzer, W., Heinrich, V., Schöpflin, R., Kraft, K., Kempfer, R., Jerković, I., Chan, W.-L., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19800 · Cited by 673
Cited by
Principles of genome folding into topologically associating domains
Szabo, Q., Bantignies, F., & Cavalli, G. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw1668 · Cited by 608
Nonlinear control of transcription through enhancer–promoter interactions
Zuin, J., Roth, G., Zhan, Y., Cramard, J., Redolfi, J., Piskadlo, E., Mach, P., Kryzhanovska, M., Tihanyi, G., Kohler, H., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04570-y · Cited by 415
Self-citationTADs are 3D structural units of higher-order chromosome organization in Drosophila
Szabo, Q., Jost, D., Chang, J.-M., Cattoni, D. I., Papadopoulos, G. L., Bonev, B., Sexton, T., Gurgo, J., Jacquier, C., Nollmann, M., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar8082 · Cited by 282
Barrington, C., Georgopoulou, D., Pezic, D., Varsally, W., Herrero, J., & Hadjur, S. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10725-9 · Cited by 102
DamC reveals principles of chromatin folding in vivo without crosslinking and ligation
Redolfi, J., Zhan, Y., Valdes-Quezada, C., Kryzhanovska, M., Guerreiro, I., Iesmantavicius, V., Pollex, T., Grand, R. S., Mulugeta, E., Kind, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-019-0231-0 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhan, Y., Mariani, L., Barozzi, I., Schulz, E. G., Blüthgen, N., Stadler, M., Tiana, G., & Giorgetti, L.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2017-01-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 479-490
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- OpenAlex
- W2568062379
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 14
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reciprocal insulation analysis of Hi-C data shows that TADs represent a functionally but not structurally privileged scale in the hierarchical folding of chromosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.212803.116
- The paper
- Zhan, Y., Mariani, L., Barozzi, I., Schulz, E. G., Blüthgen, N., Stadler, M., Tiana, G., & Giorgetti, L. (2017). Reciprocal insulation analysis of Hi-C data shows that TADs represent a functionally but not structurally privileged scale in the hierarchical folding of chromosomes. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.212803.116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
