Assembly of a Pangenome for Global Cattle Reveals Missing Sequences and Novel Structural Variations, Providing New Insights into Their Diversity and Evolutionary History
Open accessAbstract
A cattle pangenome representation was created based on the genome sequences of 898 cattle representing 57 breeds. The pangenome identified 83 Mb of sequence not found in the cattle reference genome, representing 3.1% novel sequence compared with the 2.71-Gb reference. A catalog of structural variants developed from this cattle population identified 3.3 million deletions, 0.12 million inversions, and 0.18 million duplications. Estimates of breed ancestry and hybridization between cattle breeds using insertion/deletions as markers were similar to those produced by single nucleotide polymorphism–based analysis. Hundreds of deletions were observed to have stratification based on subspecies and breed. For example, an insertion of a Bov-tA1 repeat element was identified in the first intron of the APPL2 gene and correlated with cattle breed geographic distribution. This insertion falls within a segment overlapping predicted enhancer and promoter regions of the gene, and could affect important traits such as immune response, olfactory functions, cell proliferation, and glucose metabolism in muscle. The results indicate that pangenomes are a valuable resource for studying diversity and evolutionary history, and help to delineate how domestication, trait-based breeding, and adaptive introgression have shaped the cattle genome.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phylogenetic patterns inferred from insertion and deletion markers are congruent with those obtained from SNPs.
“Phylogenetic patterns inferred from insertion and deletion markers are congruent with those obtained from SNPs [32].”
From The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
The Results section, “Population structure derived from deletions in cattle” (page unavailable), says deletion-based analyses mirrored SNP-based population structure and produced essentially the same ancestral components. The claim extends this comparison to insertion markers and phylogenetic patterns; the cited passage establishes neither an insertion-marker comparison nor a comparison of phylogenetic trees. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 89
- Authors
- Zhou, Y., Yang, L., Han, X., Han, J., Hu, Y., Li, F., Xia, H., Peng, L., Boschiero, C., Rosen, B. D., Bickhart, D. M., Zhang, S., Guo, A., Van Tassell, C. P., Smith, T. P. L., Yang, L., & Liu, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1585-1601
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- PMC
- PMC9435747
- OpenAlex
- W4292133659
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genome Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31902148)
- Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (2021CFB463)
- AFRI (2019-67015-29321, 2021-67015-33409)
- USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- USDA ARS (0500-00093-001-00-D)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Keywords
- structural variants, novel sequences, cattle breeds, breed ancestry, hybridization, InDel markers, cattle domestication, adaptive introgression, breed diversity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Breeding, Cattle, Genetic Variation, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Genomic Structural Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review