The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic identification of functional orthologs based on protein network comparison
Open accessAbstract
Annotating protein function across species is an important task that is often complicated by the presence of large paralogous gene families. Here, we report a novel strategy for identifying functionally related proteins that supplements sequence-based comparisons with information on conserved protein–protein interactions. First, the protein interaction networks of two species are aligned by assigning proteins to sequence homology clusters using the Inparanoid algorithm. Next, probabilistic inference is performed on the aligned networks to identify pairs of proteins, one from each species, that are likely to retain the same function based on conservation of their interacting partners. Applying this method to Drosophila melanogaster and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we analyze 121 cases for which functional orthology assignment is ambiguous when sequence similarity is used alone. In 61 of these cases, the network supports a different protein pair than that favored by sequence comparisons. These results suggest that network analysis can be used to provide a key source of information for refining sequence-based homology searches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J., & Roos, D. S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1224503 · Cited by 5,707
Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
Smith, A. F. M., & Roberts, G. O. (1993) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1993.tb01466.x · Cited by 1,713
Cited by
Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein-protein interaction networks
Brohée, S., & van Helden, J. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-488 · Cited by 892
An integrative approach to ortholog prediction for disease-focused and other functional studies
Hu, Y., Flockhart, I., Vinayagam, A., Bergwitz, C., Berger, B., Perrimon, N., & Mohr, S. E. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-357 · Cited by 848
Ideker, T., & Sharan, R. (2008) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.071852.107 · Cited by 817
Self-citationFunctional and evolutionary implications of gene orthology
Gabaldón, T., & Koonin, E. V. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3456 · Cited by 643
Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks
Mitra, K., Carvunis, A.-R., Ramesh, S. K., & Ideker, T. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3552 · Cited by 535
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bandyopadhyay, S., Sharan, R., & Ideker, T.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 428-435
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151875636
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic identification of functional orthologs based on protein network comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.4526006
- The paper
- Bandyopadhyay, S., Sharan, R., & Ideker, T. (2006). Systematic identification of functional orthologs based on protein network comparison. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4526006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.