The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The chemoreceptor superfamily in the honey bee, Apis mellifera : Expansion of the odorant, but not gustatory, receptor family
Open accessAbstract
The honey bee genome sequence reveals a remarkable expansion of the insect odorant receptor (Or) family relative to the repertoires of the flies Drosophila melanogaster and Anopheles gambiae , which have 62 and 79 Ors respectively. A total of 170 Or genes were annotated in the bee, of which seven are pseudogenes. These constitute five bee-specific subfamilies in an insect Or family tree, one of which has expanded to a total of 157 genes encoding proteins with 15%–99% amino acid identity. Most of the Or genes are in tandem arrays, including one with 60 genes. This bee-specific expansion of the Or repertoire presumably underlies their remarkable olfactory abilities, including perception of several pheromone blends, kin recognition signals, and diverse floral odors. The number of Apis mellifera Ors is approximately equal to the number of glomeruli in the bee antennal lobe (160–170), consistent with a general one-receptor/one-neuron/one-glomerulus relationship. The bee genome encodes just 10 gustatory receptors (Grs) compared with the D. melanogaster and A. gambiae repertoires of 68 and 76 Grs, respectively. A lack of Gr gene family expansion primarily accounts for this difference. A nurturing hive environment and a mutualistic relationship with plants may explain the lack of Gr family expansion. The Or family is the most dramatic example of gene family expansion in the bee genome, and characterizing their caste- and sex-specific gene expression may provide clues to their specific roles in detection of pheromone, kin, and floral odors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing
Kuro-o, M., Matsumura, Y., Aizawa, H., Kawaguchi, H., Suga, T., Utsugi, T., Ohyama, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Kaname, T., Kume, E., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36285 · Cited by 3,837
A Novel Family of Divergent Seven-Transmembrane Proteins
Clyne, P. J., Warr, C. G., Freeman, M. R., Lessing, D., Kim, J., & Carlson, J. R. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81093-4 · Cited by 1,155
Cited by
Liman, E. R., Zhang, Y. V., & Montell, C. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.022 · Cited by 473
Matsuo, T., Sugaya, S., Yasukawa, J., Aigaki, T., & Fuyama, Y. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050118 · Cited by 398
Gustatory Processing in Drosophila melanogaster
Scott, K. (2018) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043331 · Cited by 215
Rizvanovic, A., Amundin, M., & Laska, M. (2013) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjs097 · Cited by 77
Identification of the trail-following pheromone receptor in termites
Diallo, S., Kašparová, K., Šulc, J., Johny, J., Křivánek, J., Nebesářová, J., Sillam-Dussès, D., Kyjaková, P., Vondrášek, J., Machara, A., et al. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.101814 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Robertson, H. M., & Wanner, K. W.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2006-10-25
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1395-1403
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127857503
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The chemoreceptor superfamily in the honey bee, Apis mellifera : Expansion of the odorant, but not gustatory, receptor family. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.5057506
- The paper
- Robertson, H. M., & Wanner, K. W. (2006). The chemoreceptor superfamily in the honey bee, Apis mellifera : Expansion of the odorant, but not gustatory, receptor family. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.5057506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.