The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subsystem Identification Through Dimensionality Reduction of Large-Scale Gene Expression Data
Open accessAbstract
The availability of parallel, high-throughput biological experiments that simultaneously monitor thousands of cellular observables provides an opportunity for investigating cellular behavior in a highly quantitative manner at multiple levels of resolution. One challenge to more fully exploit new experimental advances is the need to develop algorithms to provide an analysis at each of the relevant levels of detail. Here, the data analysis method non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) has been applied to the analysis of gene array experiments. Whereas current algorithms identify relationships on the basis of large-scale similarity between expression patterns, NMF is a recently developed machine learning technique capable of recognizing similarity between subportions of the data corresponding to localized features in expression space. A large data set consisting of 300 genome-wide expression measurements of yeast was used as sample data to illustrate the performance of the new approach. Local features detected are shown to map well to functional cellular subsystems. Functional relationships predicted by the new analysis are compared with those predicted using standard approaches; validation using bioinformatic databases suggests predictions using the new approach may be up to twice as accurate as some conventional approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: Expression index computation and outlier detection.
Li, C., & Wong, W. H. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.1.31 · Cited by 3,133
Cited by
Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints
Hoyer, P. O. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cs/0408058 · Cited by 2,591
Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization
Brunet, J.-P., Tamayo, P., Golub, T. R., & Mesirov, J. P. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308531101 · Cited by 2,183
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: An Analytical and Interpretive Tool in Computational Biology
Devarajan, K. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000029 · Cited by 454
Daemen, A., Peterson, D., Sahu, N., McCord, R., Du, X., Liu, B., Kowanetz, K., Hong, R., Moffat, J., Gao, M., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1501605112 · Cited by 398
Nonsmooth nonnegative matrix factorization (nsNMF)
Pascual-Montano, A., Carazo, J. M., Kochi, K., Lehmann, D., & Pascual-Marqui, R. D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.60 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, P. M., & Tidor, B.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1706-1718
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064690543
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subsystem Identification Through Dimensionality Reduction of Large-Scale Gene Expression Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.903503
- The paper
- Kim, P. M., & Tidor, B. (2003). Subsystem Identification Through Dimensionality Reduction of Large-Scale Gene Expression Data. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.903503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.