α2A-adrenoceptor stimulation improves prefrontal cortical regulation of behavior through inhibition of cAMP signaling in aging animals
Open accessAbstract
The working-memory functions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) are improved by stimulation of postsynaptic, α2A-adrenoceptors, especially in aged animals with PFC cognitive deficits. Thus, the α2A-adrenoceptor agonist, guanfacine, greatly improves working-memory performance in monkeys and rats following systemic administration or intra-PFC infusion. α2A-adrenoceptors are generally coupled to G i, which can inhibit adenylyl cyclases and reduce the production of cAMP. However, no study has directly examined whether the working-memory enhancement observed with guanfacine or other α2A-adrenoceptor agonists results from cAMP inhibition. The current study confirmed this hypothesis in both rats and monkeys, showing that treatments that increase cAMP-mediated signaling block guanfacine’s beneficial effects. In aged rats, guanfacine was infused directly into the prelimbic PFC and was challenged with co-infusions of the cAMP analog, Sp-cAMPS. In aging monkeys, systemically administered guanfacine was challenged with the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, rolipram, using intramuscular doses known to have no effect on their own. In both studies, agents that mimicked the actions of cAMP (rats) or increased endogenous cAMP (monkeys) completely blocked the enhancing effects of guanfacine on working-memory performance. These results are consistent with α2A-adrenoceptor stimulation enhancing PFC working-memory function via inhibition of cAMP-mediated signaling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Depletion of noradrenaline or blockade of α2A-receptors in the prefrontal cortex impairs working memory, whereas stimulation of postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the prefrontal cortex improves working memory performance.
“Thus, either depletion of noradrenaline52 or blockade of α2A-receptors in the PFC53 impairs working memory, whereas stimulation of postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the PFC improves working memory performance52,56–58.”
From Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function (2009) · cites this paper as [58]
Guanfacine mimics the enhancing effects of norepinephrine at postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the PFC, strengthening network connectivity.
“In contrast, guanfacine mimics the enhancing effects of norepinephrine at postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the PFC, strengthening network connectivity.”
From Catecholamine Influences on Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortical Networks (2011) · cites this paper as [43]
Stimulation of postsynaptic α2A receptors in dorsolateral PFC improves working memory performance.
“Conversely, stimulation of postsynaptic α2A receptors in dorsolateral PFC, e.g., with guanfacine infusions directly into this region, improves working memory performance (35,41–43).”
From Catecholamine Influences on Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortical Networks (2011) · cites this paper as [43]
Benefits of direct infusion of guanfacine into mPFC of aged rats are reversed by cAMP-PKA activator Sp-cAMPS.
“with benefits reversed by the cAMP-PKA activator, Sp-cAMPS”
From Guanfacine’s mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species (2020) · cites this paper as Ramos et al., 2006
Direct infusion of guanfacine into mPFC of aged rats improves working memory.
“by direct infusion into the mPFC of aged rats”
From Guanfacine’s mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species (2020) · cites this paper as Ramos et al., 2006
Guanfacine improves working memory performance on delayed alternation task in rats.
“Guanfacine also improves working memory performance on the delayed alternation task in rats.”
From Guanfacine’s mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species (2020) · cites this paper as Ramos et al., 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Ramos, B. P., Stark, D., Verduzco, L., van Dyck, C. H., & Arnsten, A. F. T.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Learning & Memory
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 770-776
- ISSN
- 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5485
- PMC
- PMC1783631
- OpenAlex
- W2116414711
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University
- Shire
- National Institute on Aging (R37AG006036, R01AG006036, AG06036)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- alpha2A-adrenoceptor, guanfacine, cAMP signaling, prefrontal cortex, working memory, aging, cognitive impairment, Gi protein, adenylate cyclase inhibition, rolipram, phosphodiesterase 4, prelimbic cortex
- MeSH terms
- Cyclic AMP, Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Aging, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Macaca mulatta, Memory, Short-Term, Second Messenger Systems, Signal Transduction, Guanfacine, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review