Cited by 124Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

α2A-adrenoceptor stimulation improves prefrontal cortical regulation of behavior through inhibition of cAMP signaling in aging animals

Open access
Ramos, Brian P., Stark, David, Verduzco, Luis, van Dyck, Christopher H., Arnsten, Amy F.T.·2006·Learning & Memory

Abstract

The working-memory functions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) are improved by stimulation of postsynaptic, α2A-adrenoceptors, especially in aged animals with PFC cognitive deficits. Thus, the α2A-adrenoceptor agonist, guanfacine, greatly improves working-memory performance in monkeys and rats following systemic administration or intra-PFC infusion. α2A-adrenoceptors are generally coupled to G i, which can inhibit adenylyl cyclases and reduce the production of cAMP. However, no study has directly examined whether the working-memory enhancement observed with guanfacine or other α2A-adrenoceptor agonists results from cAMP inhibition. The current study confirmed this hypothesis in both rats and monkeys, showing that treatments that increase cAMP-mediated signaling block guanfacine’s beneficial effects. In aged rats, guanfacine was infused directly into the prelimbic PFC and was challenged with co-infusions of the cAMP analog, Sp-cAMPS. In aging monkeys, systemically administered guanfacine was challenged with the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, rolipram, using intramuscular doses known to have no effect on their own. In both studies, agents that mimicked the actions of cAMP (rats) or increased endogenous cAMP (monkeys) completely blocked the enhancing effects of guanfacine on working-memory performance. These results are consistent with α2A-adrenoceptor stimulation enhancing PFC working-memory function via inhibition of cAMP-mediated signaling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.298006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 44 · Cited by 124

Authors
Ramos, B. P., Stark, D., Verduzco, L., van Dyck, C. H., & Arnsten, A. F. T.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2006-11
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
770-776
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2116414711
Cited by
124
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Shire
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG006036, R01AG006036, AG06036)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
alpha2A-adrenoceptor, guanfacine, cAMP signaling, prefrontal cortex, working memory, aging, cognitive impairment, Gi protein, adenylate cyclase inhibition, rolipram, phosphodiesterase 4, prelimbic cortex
MeSH terms
Cyclic AMP, Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Aging, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Macaca mulatta, Memory, Short-Term, Second Messenger Systems, Signal Transduction, Guanfacine, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review