Overexpression of hAPPswe Impairs Rewarded Alternation and Contextual Fear Conditioning in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
Open accessAbstract
One of the hallmarks of the pathology in Alzheimer's disease is the deposition of amyloid plaques throughout the brain, especially within the hippocampus and amygdala. Transgenic mice that overexpress the Swedish mutation of human amyloid precursor protein (hAPPswe;Tg2576) show age-dependent memory deficits in hippocampus-dependent learning tasks. However, the performance of aged Tg2576 mice in amygdala-dependent learning tasks has not been thoroughly assessed. We trained young (2–4 mo) and old (16–18 mo) Tg2576 and wild-type mice in a T-maze alternation task (hippocampus-dependent) and a Pavlovian fear-conditioning task (amygdala- and hippocampus-dependent). As previously reported, old Tg2576 mice showed impaired acquisition of rewarded alternation; none of these mice reached the criterion of at least five out of six correct responses over three consecutive days. In contrast, old Tg2576 mice showed normal levels of conditional freezing to an auditory conditional stimulus (CS) and acquired a contextual discrimination normally. However, when the salience of the fear-conditioning context was decreased, old (12–14 mo) Tg2576 mice were impaired at acquiring fear to the conditioning context, but not to the tone CS. Histological examination of a subset of the mice verified the existence of amyloid plaques in the cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala of old, but not young, Tg2576 mice. Hence, learning and memory deficits in old Tg2576 mice are limited to hippocampus-dependent tasks, despite widespread amyloid deposition in cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study characterized multiple memory systems of BRI2-Aβ mice to strengthen experimental and external validity and eliminate potential false negative results of cognitive evaluation.
“To strengthen experimental and external validity of our study and to eliminate potential false negative results of cognitive evaluation, which could be observed only in one test or even limited to specific experimental settings [33], we characterized multiple memory systems of BRI2-Aβ mice.”
From Normal cognition in transgenic BRI2-Aβ mice (2013) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 135
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Moran, P.M., Higgins, L.S., Cordell, B., and Moser, P.C. 1995. Age-related learning deficits in transgenic mice expressing the 751-amino acid isoform of human -amyloid precursor protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92: 5341-5345.
- Rescorla, R.A. and Wagner, A.R. 1972. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (eds. A.H. Black and W.F. Prokasy), pp. 64-99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
- Sturchler-Pierrat, C., Abramowski, D., Duke, M., Wiederhold, K.H., Mistl, C., Rothacher, S., Ledermann, B., Burki, K., Frey, P., Paganetti, P.A., et al. 1997. Two amyloid precursor protein transgenic mouse models with Alzheimer disease-like pathology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 13287-13292.
- Authors
- Corcoran, K. A., Lu, Y., Turner, R. S., & Maren, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Learning & Memory
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 243-252
- ISSN
- 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5485
- PMC
- PMC187133
- OpenAlex
- W2039397120
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (5r29mh057865-03)
- National Institute on Aging (P50AG008671)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH57865)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, Tg2576 mice, amyloid precursor protein, amyloid plaques, contextual fear conditioning, fear conditioning, hippocampus-dependent learning, contextual discrimination, hippocampus
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Classical, Discrimination Learning, Disease Models, Animal, Electroshock, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Reward, Gene Expression, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Maze Learning, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review