Sleep enhances explicit recollection in recognition memory
Open accessAbstract
Recognition memory is considered to be supported by two different memory processes, i.e., the explicit recollection of information about a previous event and an implicit process of recognition based on an acontextual sense of familiarity. Both types of memory supposedly rely on distinct memory systems. Sleep is known to enhance the consolidation of memories, with the different sleep stages affecting different types of memory. In the present study, we used the process-dissociation procedure to compare the effects of sleep on estimates of explicit (recollection) and implicit (familiarity) memory formation on a word-list discrimination task. Subjects studied two lists of words before a 3-h retention interval of sleep or wakefulness, and recognition was tested afterward. The retention intervals were positioned either in the early night when sleep is dominated by slow-wave sleep (SWS), or in the late night, when sleep is dominated by REM sleep. Sleep enhanced explicit recognition memory, as compared with wakefulness (P < 0.05), whereas familiarity was not affected by sleep. Moreover, explicit recognition was particularly enhanced after sleep in the early-night retention interval, and especially when the words were presented with the same contextual features as during learning, i.e., in the same font (P < 0.05). The data indicate that in a task that allows separating the contribution of explicit and implicit memory, sleep particularly supports explicit memory formation. The mechanism of this effect appears to be linked to SWS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effects of early SWS-rich sleep on declarative memory are more consistent with free or cued recall measures than with recognition measures.
“Improving the effects of early SWS-rich sleep on declarative memory appeared to be overall more consistent with free (or cued) recall measures than with recognition measures of memory (265, 326, 667, 966; see Ref. 297, for a review), possibly reflecting that unlike recollection, familiarity based recognition taps to a greater extent implicit components of these memories (1343,1344).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [326]
The Discussion reports that early SWS-rich sleep particularly improved explicit recollection in a recognition task, while familiarity-based recognition did not benefit from sleep. That supports a distinction between recognition processes, but the paper does not compare free or cued recall measures with recognition measures; its finding also cautions against treating all recognition measures as less sensitive to early sleep. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEarly SWS-rich sleep enhances recollection of words compared with late REM-rich sleep or wake intervals, while familiarity-based recognition remains unaffected.
“Two studies found enhanced recollection (of words) after early, SWS-rich sleep, compared with a late REM-rich sleep or wake intervals, while familiarity-based recognition measures remained unaffected (265,326).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [326]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 128
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Gais, S. and Born, J. 2004. Low acetylcholine during slow-wave sleep is critical for declarative memory consolidation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 2140-2144.
- Henke, K., Weber, B., Kneifel, S., Wieser, H.G., and Buck, A. 1999. Human hippocampus associates information in memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 5884-5889.
- McNaughton, B.L., Barnes, C.A., Battaglia, F.P., Bower, M.R., Cowen, S.L., Ekstrom, A.D., Gerrard, J.L., Hoffman, K.L., Houston, F.P., Karten, Y., et al. 2003. Off-line reprocessing of recent memory and its role in memory consolidation: A progress report. In Sleep and brain plasticity, (eds. P. Maquet et al.) pp. 225-246. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
- Mo ¨lle, M., Marshall, L., Gais, S., and Born, J. 2004. Learning increases human electroencephalographic coherence during subsequent slow sleep oscillations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 13963-13968.
- Robertson, E.M., Pascual-Leone, A., and Press, D.Z. 2004. Awareness modifies the skill-learning benefits of sleep. Curr. Biol. 14: 208-212.
- Yonelinas, A.P. 2002. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. J. Mem. Lang. 46: 441-517.
- Authors
- Drosopoulos, S., Wagner, U., & Born, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- ORCID
- Wagner, Ullrich
- Venue
- Learning & Memory
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-51
- ISSN
- 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5485
- PMC
- PMC548495
- OpenAlex
- W2151892163
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiteit van Amsterdam
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- sleep, recognition memory, familiarity, memory consolidation, slow-wave sleep, REM sleep, process dissociation, contextual interference, retention interval
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Learning, Male, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Mental Recall, Saliva, Sleep, Sleep, REM, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review