Cited by 13Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCell Image Analysis TechniquesDigital Holography and Microscopy

Imaging Cellular Spheroids with a Single (Selective) Plane Illumination Microscope

Swoger, Jim, Pampaloni, Francesco, Stelzer, Ernst H.K.·2014·Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Abstract

In modern biology, most optical imaging technologies are applied to two-dimensional cell culture systems. However, investigation of physiological context requires specimens that display the complex three-dimensional (3D) relationship of cells that occurs in tissue sections and in naturally developing organisms. The imaging of highly scattering multicellular specimens presents a number of challenges, including limited optical penetration depth, phototoxicity, and fluorophore bleaching. Light-sheet-based fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) overcomes many drawbacks of conventional fluorescence microscopy by using an orthogonal/azimuthal fluorescence arrangement with independent sets of lenses for illumination and detection. The specimen is illuminated from the side with a thin light sheet that overlaps with the focal plane of a wide-field fluorescence microscope. Optical sectioning and minimal phototoxic damage or photobleaching outside a small volume close to the focal plane are intrinsic properties of LSFM. The principles of LSFM are implemented in the single (or selective) plane illumination microscope (SPIM). Cellular spheroids are spherical aggregations of hundreds to thousands of cells and they provide a useful model system for studies of 3D cell biology. Here we describe a protocol for imaging cellular spheroids by SPIM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/pdb.prot080176

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conventional wide-field fluorescence microscopy is limited in resolving fluorescence signals within thick or optically dense spheroids, reducing contrast and spatial resolution, particularly for large spheroids.

    “conventional wide-field fluorescence microscopy is limited in its ability to resolve fluorescence signals within thick or optically dense spheroids as it collects out-of-focus light from the entire specimen and projects it onto a single focal plane. This results in reduced contrast and loss of spatial resolution, particularly for large spheroids [244].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swoger, J., Pampaloni, F., & Stelzer, E. H. K.
Venue
Cold Spring Harbor Protocols
Published
2013-12-26
Volume
2014
Issue
1
Pages
pdb.prot080176
ISSN
  • 1559-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-3402
OpenAlex
W1978183395
Cited by
13
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cold Spring Harbor Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Digital Holography and Microscopy
Keywords
cellular spheroids, single plane illumination microscopy, light-sheet microscopy, 3D cell imaging, optical sectioning, phototoxicity, photobleaching, optical penetration depth
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Lighting, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Spheroids, Cellular, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Optical Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review