Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Insect Olfactory Receptors

Boeckh, J., Kaissling, K. E., Schneider, D.·1965·Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

Abstract

Studies dealing with the well-known olfactory powers of insects have been undertaken for a num-ber of purposes, using different methods. Many investigators have observed the behavioral response elicited by odor stimuli n order to localize olfactory reception on the antenna, as was first done con-clusively by Von Frisch (1921), or to study the whole animal's odor threshold and odor discrimina-tion (Von Friseh, 1919, Dethier, 1954, and many others) or, finally, to study the animal's orientation toward the odor source (Fabre, 1879; Schwinck,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.028

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Boeckh, J., Kaissling, K. E., & Schneider, D.
Venue
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
Published
1965-01-01
Volume
30
Issue
0
Pages
263-280
ISSN
  • 0091-7451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4456
OpenAlex
W2139776869
Cited by
356
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insect Olfactory Receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.028
The paper
Boeckh, J., Kaissling, K. E., & Schneider, D. (1965). Insect Olfactory Receptors. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.