Cited by 203Insect Pheromone Research and ControlFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsWind and Air Flow Studies

Odor Landscapes in Turbulent Environments

Open access
Celani, Antonio, Villermaux, Emmanuel, Vergassola, Massimo·2014·Physical Review X

Abstract

The olfactory system of male moths is exquisitely sensitive to pheromones emitted by females and transported in the environment by atmospheric turbulence.Moths respond to minute amounts of pheromones, and their behavior is sensitive to the fine-scale structure of turbulent plumes where pheromone concentration is detectible.The signal of pheromone whiffs is qualitatively known to be intermittent, yet quantitative characterization of its statistical properties is lacking.This challenging fluid dynamics problem is also relevant for entomology, neurobiology, and the technological design of olfactory stimulators aimed at reproducing physiological odor signals in well-controlled laboratory conditions.Here, we develop a Lagrangian approach to the transport of pheromones by turbulent flows and exploit it to predict the statistics of odor detection during olfactory searches.The theory yields explicit probability distributions for the intensity and the duration of pheromone detections, as well as their spacing in time.Predictions are favorably tested by using numerical simulations, laboratory experiments, and field data for the atmospheric surface layer.The resulting signal of odor detections lends itself to implementation with state-of-the-art technologies and quantifies the amount and the type of information that male moths can exploit during olfactory searches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevx.4.041015

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Locating the source of an odour in a windy environment is a challenging control problem, where an agent must act to correct course in the face of intermittent odour signals, changing wind direction and variability in odour plume shape.

    “Locating the source of an odour in a windy environment is a challenging control problem, where an agent must act to correct course in the face of intermittent odour signals, changing wind direction and variability in odour plume shape 1,2 .”
  • The plume simulator does not capture some aspects of real plumes, such as the filamentous nature of plumes or the variation of whiff duration and whiff frequency as a function of distance from source.

    “However, it does not capture some aspects of real plumes, such as the filamentous nature of plumes 2 , or the variation of whiff duration and whiff frequency as a function of distance from source 69 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. T. D. Wyatt, Pheromones and Animal Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003).
  2. C. Wall and J. N. Perry, Range of Action of Moth Sex- Attractant Sources, Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 44, 5 (1987). · DOI
  3. E. Villermaux and C. Innocenti, On the Geometry of Turbulent Mixing, J. Fluid Mech. 393, 123 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  4. M. Kree, J. Duplat, and E. Villermaux, The Mixing of Distant Sources, Phys. Fluids 25, 091103 (2013). · DOI
  5. A. M. Angioy, A. Desogus, I. Tomassini Barbarossa, P. Anderson, and B. S. Hansson, Extreme Sensitivity in an Olfactory System, Chem. Senses 28, 279 (2003). · DOI
  6. J. Boeckh, K. E. Kaissling, and D. Schneider, Insect Olfactory Receptors, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 30, 263 (1965). · DOI
  7. T. C. Baker and R. T. Cardé, Analysis of Pheromone- Mediated Behaviors in Male Grapholitha Molesta, the Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), Environ- mental entomology 8, 956 (1979).
  8. T. C. Baker, H. J. Fadamiro, and A. A. Cosse, Moth Uses Fine Tuning for Odour Resolution, Nature (London) 393, 530 (1998). · DOI
  9. J. A. Riffell, Olfactory Ecology and the Processing of Complex Mixtures, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 236 (2012). · DOI
  10. J. Murlis, J. S. Elkinton, and R. T. Cardé, Odor Plumes and How Insects Use Them, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 505 (1992). · DOI
  11. J. S. Kennedy, A. R. Ludlow, and C. J. Sanders, Guidance of Flying Male Moths by Wind-Borne Sex Pheromone, Physiol. Entomol. 6, 395 (1981). · DOI
  12. M. A. Willis and T. C. Baker, Effects of Intermittent and Continuous Pheromone Stimulation on the Flight Behav- iour of the Oriental Fruit Moth, Grapholita molesta, Physiol. Entomol. 9, 341 (1984). · DOI
  13. T. C. Baker, M. A. Willis, K. F. Haynes, and P. L. Phelan, A Pulsed Cloud of Sex Pheromone Elicits Upwind Flight in Male Moths, Physiol. Entomol. 10, 257 (1985). · DOI
  14. W. H. Bossert and E. O. Wilson, The Analysis of Olfactory Communication Among Animals, J. Theor. Biol. 5, 443 (1963). · DOI
  15. W. H. Bossert, Temporal Patterning in Olfactory Commu- nication, J. Theor. Biol. 18, 157 (1968). · DOI
  16. W. Li, J. A. Farrell, and R. T. Cardé, Tracking of Fluid- Advected Odor Plumes: Strategies Inspired by Insect Ori- entation to Pheromone, Adaptive Behavior 9, 143 (2001). · DOI
  17. J. J. Hopfield, Olfactory Computation and Object Percep- tion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 6462 (1991). · DOI
  18. B. J. Duistermars, D. M. Chow, and M. A. Frye, Flies Require Bilateral Sensory Input to Track Odor Gradients in Flight, Curr. Biol. 19, 1301 (2009). · DOI
  19. V. Bhandawat, G. Maimon, M. H. Dickinson, and R. I. Wilson, Olfactory Modulation of Flight in Drosophila Is Sensitive, Selective and Rapid, J. Exp. Biol. 213, 3625 (2010). · DOI
  20. P. A. Durbin, A Stochastic Model of Two-Particle Dispersion and Concentration Fluctuations in Homogeneous Turbu- lence, J. Fluid Mech. 100, 279 (1980). · DOI
  21. J. C. R. Hunt, Turbulent Diffusion from Sources in Complex Flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17, 447 (1985). · DOI
  22. J. D. Wilson and B. L. Sawford, Review of Lagrangian Stochastic Models for Trajectories in the Turbulent Atmos- phere, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol. 78, 191 (1996). · DOI
  23. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
  24. B. I. Shraiman and E. D. Siggia, Scalar Turbulence, Nature (London) 405, 639 (2000). · DOI
  25. G. Falkovich, K. Gawędzki, and M. Vergassola, Particles and Fields in Fluid Turbulence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 913 (2001). · DOI
  26. U. Frisch, Turbulence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
  27. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 2 (Wiley, New York, 1971).
  28. D. Aldous, Probability Approximations via the Poisson Clumping Heuristic, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 77 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989).
  29. J. Duplat, C. Innocenti, and E. Villermaux, A Nonsequential Turbulent Mixing Process, Phys. Fluids 22, 035104 (2010). · DOI
  30. P. Witzgall, L. Stelinski, L. Gut, and D. Thomson, Codling Moth Management and Chemical Ecology, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53, 503 (2008). · DOI
  31. W. Takken and B. G. J. Knols, Strategic Use of Chemical Ecology for Vector-Borne Diseases, in Olfaction in Vector- Host Interactions, Ecology and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases, Vol. 2 (Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 2010).
  32. U. Frisch, A. Mazzino, and M. Vergassola, Intermittency in Passive Scalar Advection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5532 (1998). · DOI
  33. J. C. Kaimal and J. J. Finnigan, Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement (Oxford University Press, England, 1994).
  34. E. Yee, P. R. Kosteniuk, and J. F. Bowers, A Study of Concentration Fluctuations in Instantaneous Clouds Dispersing in the Atmospheric Surface Layer for Relative Turbulent Diffusion: Basic Descriptive Statistics, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol. 87, 409 (1998). · DOI
  35. K. R. Mylne and P. J. Mason, Concentration Fluctuation Measurements in a Dispersing Plume at a Range up to 1000 m, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 117, 177 (1991). · DOI
  36. E. Yee, P. R. Kosteniuk, G. M. Chandler, C. A. Biltoft, and J. F. Bowers, Statistical Characteristics of Concentration Fluctuations in Dispersion Plumes in the Atmospheric Surface Layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol. 65, 69 (1993). · DOI
  37. E. Yee, R. Chan, P. R. Kosteniuk, G. M. Chandler, C. A. Biltoft, and J. F. Bowers, Measurements of Level-Crossing Statistics of Concentration Fluctuations in Plumes Dispers- ing in the Atmospheric Surface Layer, Bound.-Lay. Mete- orol. 73, 53 (1995). · DOI
  38. T. C. Baker, R. T. Cardé, and J. R. Miller, Oriental Fruit Moth Pheromone Component Emission Rates Measured After Collection by Glass-Surface Adsorption, Journal of chemical ecology 6, 749 (1980). · DOI
  39. M. Tabuchi et al., Pheromone Responsiveness Threshold Depends on Temporal Integration by Antennal Lobe Projec- tion Neurons, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 15455 (2013). · DOI
  40. A. Mafra-Neto and R. T. Cardé, Fine-Scale Structure of Pheromone Plumes Modulates Upwind Orientation of Flying Moths, Nature (London) 369, 142 (1994). · DOI
  41. T. C. Baker and N. J. Vickers, Pheromone-Mediated Flight in Moths, in Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions, edited by R. T. Cardé and A. K. Minks (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997), pp. 232-247.
  42. J. A. Farrell, S. Pang, and W. Li, Chemical Plume Tracing via an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 30, 428 (2005). · DOI
  43. C. Martelli, J. R. Carlson, and T. Emonet, Intensity Invariant Dynamics and Odor-Specific Latencies in Olfac- tory Receptor Neuron Response, J. Neurosci. 33, 6285 (2013). · DOI
  44. L. G. Leal, Advanced Transport Phenomena (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  45. M. Chaves, K. Gawędzki, P. Horvai, A. Kupiainen, and M. Vergassola, Lagrangian Dispersion in Gaussian Self-Similar Velocity Ensembles, J. Stat. Phys. 113, 643 (2003). · DOI
  46. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/ supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041015 for further details on the analytical derivations and the numerical method employed for the Kraichnan model.
  47. M. Denny, Introduction to Importance Sampling in Rare Event Simulations, Eur. J. Phys. 22, 403 (2001). · DOI
  48. P. Glasserman, Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Celani, A., Villermaux, E., & Vergassola, M.
Affiliations
  • The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Physical Review X
Published
2014-10-28
Volume
4
Issue
4
ISSN
2160-3308 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036811519
Cited by
203
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review X (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-BINF-05, ANR-10)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Wind and Air Flow Studies
Keywords
pheromone detection, male moths, atmospheric turbulence, turbulent plumes, Lagrangian transport, atmospheric surface layer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review