The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Equivalence checking of quantum circuits via intermediary matrix product operator
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
As quantum computing advances, the complexity of quantum circuits is rapidly increasing, driving the need for robust methods to aid in their design. Equivalence checking plays a vital role in identifying errors that may arise during compilation and optimization of these circuits and is a critical step in quantum circuit verification. In this work, we introduce a method based on matrix product operators (MPOs) for determining the equivalence of quantum circuits. Our approach contracts tensorized quantum gates from two circuits into an intermediary MPO, exploiting their reversibility to determine their equivalence or nonequivalence. Our results show that this method offers significant scalability improvements over existing methods, with polynomial scaling in circuit width and depth for the practical use cases we explore. We expect that this work to set a standard for scalable equivalence checking of quantum circuits and will become a crucial tool for the validation of increasingly complex quantum systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entangling power of quantum evolutions
Zanardi, P., Zalka, C., & Faoro, L. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.030301 · Cited by 419
Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states
Vanderstraeten, L., Haegeman, J., & Verstraete, F. (2019) · SciPost Physics Lecture Notes · doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.7 · Cited by 233
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1145/3527330 · DOI
- O. Di Matteo, 2024, International Workshop on Quantum Software Engineering
- 2004, Advanced Formal Verification,
- 10.1142/S0219749905001067 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/025012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035129 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.035147 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147902 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1751-8121/aa6dc3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aop.2019.167998 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.22331/q-2020-06-04-279 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.022406 · DOI
- 10.1109/JETCAS.2022.3202204 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/16/9/093021 · DOI
- 10.4204/EPTCS.172.20 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCAD.2018.2834427 · DOI
- 10.1145/3491246 · DOI
- R. Wille, 2023, Design Automation of Quantum Computers
- S.-I. Minato, Zero-suppressed BDDs for set manipulation in combinatorial problems, in Design Automation Conference (IEEE, 1993), pp. 272–277. · DOI
- 10.1109/TCAD.2020.3032630 · DOI
- A. Sander, 2024, International Conference on Quantum Software
- X. Hong, M. Ying, Y. Feng, X. Zhou, and S. Li, Approximate equivalence checking of noisy quantum circuits, in Design Automation Conference (IEEE Press, San Francisco, 2021), pp. 637–642. · DOI
- X. Hong, Y. Feng, S. Li, and M. Ying, Equivalence checking of dynamic quantum circuits, in International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (IEEE, San Diego, CA, 2022), pp. 1–8. · DOI
- 10.22331/q-2021-03-15-410 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.030501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.115117 · DOI
- 10.1088/2058-9565/ad3eab · DOI
- S.-J. Ran, 2020, Tensor Network Contractions: Methods and Applications to Quantum Many-Body Systems, 10.1007/978-3-030-34489-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.21105/joss.00753 · DOI
- R. Wille, 2024, International Conference on Quantum Software
- 10.1002/qute.201900070 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s43588-021-00119-7 · DOI
- 10.3389/fams.2022.838601 · DOI
- H. Bayraktar, 2023, International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering
Metadata
- Authors
- Sander, A., Burgholzer, L., & Wille, R.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Software Competence Center Hagenberg (Austria) (AT)
- Venue
- Physical Review Research
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2025-06-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403573081
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 (101001318)
- Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz
- Bundesministerium für Digitalisierung und Wirtschaftsstandort
- Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- matrix product operators, quantum circuit verification, tensor network contraction, quantum circuit compilation, quantum circuit optimization, scalability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review