The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polaritonic machine learning for graph-based data analysis
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Photonic and polaritonic systems offer a fast and efficient platform for accelerating machine learning (ML) through physics-based computing. To gain a computational advantage, however, polaritonic systems must meet the following: (1) exploit features that specifically favor nonlinear optical processing; (2) address problems that are computationally hard and depend on these features; and (3) integrate photonic processing within broader ML pipelines. In this work, we propose a polaritonic machine learning approach for solving graph-based data problems. We demonstrate how lattices of condensates can efficiently embed relational and topological information from point cloud datasets. This information is then incorporated into a pattern recognition workflow based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), leading to significantly improved learning performance compared to physics-agnostic methods. Our extensive benchmarking shows that photonic machine learning achieves over 90% accuracy for Betti number classification and clique detection tasks, a substantial improvement over the 35% accuracy of bare CNNs. Our study introduces a distinct way of using photonic systems as fast tools for feature engineering, while building on top of high-performing digital machine learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Direct Observation of Dirac Cones and a Flatband in a Honeycomb Lattice for Polaritons
Jacqmin, T., Carusotto, I., Sagnes, I., Abbarchi, M., Solnyshkov, D. D., Malpuech, G., Galopin, E., Lemaître, A., Bloch, J., & Amo, A. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.116402 · Cited by 509
Research works printed but not linked: 121
- A. Vaswani, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)
- T. Brown, 2020, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 33, 1877
- 10.1126/sciadv.1602614 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06559-7 · DOI
- 10.1142/S2811032322500047 · DOI
- A. Krizhevsky, 2012, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 25
- 10.4208/cicp.OA-2018-0035 · DOI
- M. Zhang, 2018, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- J. Sevilla, 2022, 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)
- 10.1038/d41586-025-01113-z · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-025-57352-1 · DOI
- 10.1088/2399-1984/ad299a · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.042202 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42254-023-00645-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41377-024-01590-3 · DOI
- 10.1117/1.AP.7.2.024001 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aat8084 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-03070-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-04223-6 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade8450 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41566-023-01170-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-33386-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-51509-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-54931-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-55058-4 · DOI
- 10.1515/nanoph-2025-0001 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1489 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.299 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.crhy.2016.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.035306 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.10830 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.115409 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42005-019-0278-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023033 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-025-61607-2 · DOI
- 10.1103/r8m8-hckx · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.227402 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aat8880 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-33940-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-39358-9 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.195435 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-22537-x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41377-024-01382-9 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.245302 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-17340-z · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021011 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.197402 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-41079-y · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03228-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41377-023-01268-2 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.207401 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-648X/ae20e5 · DOI
- 10.1103/gr72-szwg · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys2999 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.047402 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05131 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12036 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42254-022-00447-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys1051 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07640 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys1668 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.126402 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys1841 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-14702-5 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.add1299 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.adj1589 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2011.267 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms9317 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.085413 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041028 · DOI
- 10.1364/OME.414890 · DOI
- 10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/035032 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.097401 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195301 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-16656-0 · DOI
- 10.1002/advs.202400672 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41563-024-01980-3 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.186403 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmat4971 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-25845-4 · DOI
- 10.1063/5.0180272 · DOI
- 10.1002/adom.202500304 · DOI
- 10.1364/OME.496985 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.064029 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00435 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04696 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.054037 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41377-024-01719-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.202507612 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.024045 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41534-019-0149-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3009716 · DOI
- 10.1002/qute.202100053 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042402 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41566-022-01019-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41563-019-0282-y · DOI
- 10.1038/s41563-019-0281-z · DOI
- C. Ying, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- L. Ma, 2023, Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)
- 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100045 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms10138 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.22331/q-2022-12-07-873 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.042616 · DOI
- 10.1063/5.0209201 · DOI
- H. Edelsbrunner, 2009, Computational Topology: An Introduction, 10.1090/mbk/069 · DOI
- 10.3389/frai.2021.667963 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-4485(88)90138-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00454-013-9557-2 · DOI
- 10.1002/nme.2135 · DOI
- 10.1145/3321515 · DOI
- R. E. Bank, 1983, Scientific Computing, IMACS Trans. Sci. Comput., 1, 3
- 10.1007/BF02760024 · DOI
- R. M. Karp, 1972, Complexity of Computer Computations
- 10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · DOI · Paper page
- S. Ioffe, 2015, International Conference on Machine Learning
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.140402 · DOI
- 10.1364/OPTICA.409976 · DOI
- M. Bern, 2000, Handbook of Computational Geometry
- 10.1103/PhysRev.112.1555 · DOI
- D. Kinga, 2015, International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Scali, S., & Kyriienko, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield
- University of Exeter (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2026-08-26
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 025305-025305
- ISSN
- 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0053
- OpenAlex
- W7172496691
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical review. E (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/X017222/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
- Keywords
- point cloud data, clique detection, nonlinear optical processing, convolutional neural networks, feature engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polaritonic machine learning for graph-based data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/fgy1-n4vp
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Scali, S., & Kyriienko, O. (2026). Polaritonic machine learning for graph-based data analysis. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/fgy1-n4vp