The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causality and the Dispersion Relation: Logical Foundations
Abstract
"Strict causality" is the assumption that no signal whatsoever can be transmitted over a space-like interval in space-time, or that no signal can travel faster than the velocity of light in vacuo. In this paper a rigorous proof is given of the logical equivalence of strict causality ("no output before the input") and the validity of a dispersion relation, e.g., the relation expressing the real part of a generalized scattering amplitude as an integral involving the imaginary part. This proof applies to a general linear system with a time-independent connection between the output and a freely variable input and has the advantage over previous work that no tacit assumptions are made about the analytic behavior or single-valuedness of the amplitude, but, on the contrary, strict causality is shown to imply that the generalized scattering amplitude is analytic in the upper half of the complex frequency plane. The dispersion relations are given first as a relation between the real and imaginary parts of the generalized scattering amplitude and then in terms of the complex phase shift.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Network analysis and feedback amplifier design
Bode, H. W. (1945) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 3,119
Shohat, J., & Tamarkin, J. D. (1943) · Mathematical surveys and monographs · doi:10.1090/surv/001 · Cited by 1,659
Classical theory of radiating electrons
Dirac, P. A. M. (1938) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1938.0124 · Cited by 1,595
Interaction with the Absorber as the Mechanism of Radiation
Wheeler, J. A., & Feynman, R. P. (1945) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.17.157 · Cited by 1,262
The Fourier Integral: and certain of its Applications
(1933) · Nature · doi:10.1038/132731b0 · Cited by 826
Use of Causality Conditions in Quantum Theory
Gell‐Mann, M., Goldberger, M. L., & Thirring, W. E. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.95.1612 · Cited by 527
Über die Fortpflanzung des Lichtes in dispergierenden Medien
Sommerfeld, A. (1914) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19143491002 · Cited by 389
Über die Fortpflanzung des Lichtes in dispergierenden Medien
Brillouin, L. (1914) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19143491003 · Cited by 307
The Scattering of Slow Electrons by Neutral Atoms
Feenberg, E. (1932) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.40.40 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Electrodynamics of high-Tcsuperconductors
Basov, D. N., & Timusk, T. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.721 · Cited by 788
Theory of Midinfrared Absorption Microspectroscopy: I. Homogeneous Samples
Davis, B. J., Carney, P. S., & Bhargava, R. (2010) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac902067p · Cited by 115
What did Kramers and Kronig do and how did they do it?
Bohren, C. F. (2010) · European Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/0143-0807/31/3/014 · Cited by 112
Tanner, D. B. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781316672778 · Cited by 106
Multiply subtractive kramers-kronig analysis of optical data.
Palmer, K. F., Williams, M. Z., & Budde, B. A. (1998) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.37.002660 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Toll, J. S.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1956-12-15
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1760-1770
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076972285
- Cited by
- 1,083
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causality and the Dispersion Relation: Logical Foundations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.104.1760
- The paper
- Toll, J. S. (1956). Causality and the Dispersion Relation: Logical Foundations. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.104.1760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.