The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classical theory of radiating electrons
Abstract
The Lorentz model of the electron as a small sphere charged with electricity, possessing mass on account of the energy of the electric field around it, has proved very valuable in accounting for the motion and radiation of electrons in a certain domain of problems, in which the electromagnetic field does not vary too rapidly and the accelerations of the electrons are not too great. Beyond this domain it will not go unless supplemented by further assumptions about the forces that hold the charge on an electron together. No natural way of introducing such further assumptions has been discovered, and it seems that the Lorentz model has reached the limit of its usefulness and must be abandoned before we can make further progress. One of the most attractive ideas in the Lorentz model of the electron, the idea that all mass is of electromagnetic; origin, appears at the present time to be wrong, for two separate reasons. First, the discovery of the neutron has provided us with a form of mass which it is very hard to believe could be of electromagnetic nature. Secondly, we have the theory of the positron— a theory in agreement with experiment so far as is known—in which positive and negative values for the mass of an electron play symmetrical roles. This cannot be fitted in with the electromagnetic idea of mass, which insists on all mass being positive, even in abstract theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Causality and the Dispersion Relation: Logical Foundations
Toll, J. S. (1956) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.104.1760 · Cited by 1,083
Higher-derivative Lagrangians, nonlocality, problems, and solutions
Simon, J. Z. (1990) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.3720 · Cited by 432
Uniformly Accelerating Charged Mass in General Relativity
Kinnersley, W., & Walker, M. (1970) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.2.1359 · Cited by 375
General-relativistic celestial mechanics. I. Method and definition of reference systems
Damour, T., Soffel, M., & Xu, C. (1991) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.3273 · Cited by 310
Feynman and the visualization of space-time processes
Schweber, S. S. (1986) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.58.449 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Dirac, P. A. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1938-08-05
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 929
- Pages
- 148-169
- ISSN
- 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9169
- OpenAlex
- W2146075155
- Cited by
- 1,595
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classical theory of radiating electrons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1938.0124
- The paper
- Dirac, P. A. M. (1938). Classical theory of radiating electrons. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1938.0124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.