Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optical Properties of Nickel and Tungsten and Their Interpretation According to Drude's Formula

Roberts, S.·1959·Physical Review

Abstract

New optical data are reported for nickel at 88\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}, 298\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}, and 473\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K and for tungsten at 298\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}, 1100\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}, and 1600\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K in the wavelength range 0.365 to 2.65 microns. These data are shown to depend on wavelength in a way which is in good quantitative agreement with a formula initially proposed by Drude. By attributing different terms in Drude's equation to the motion of different classes of free and bound electrons, one may conclude that several classes of each are present in both metals. Each class of free electrons accounts for a portion of the dc conductivity and has its own characteristic relaxation time or wavelength. From this analysis it appears that most of the dc conductivity may be attributed to one class of free electrons, although optical properties are strongly influenced by other classes as well. In both metals the characteristic wavelength ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{r1}$ of the first class of free electrons proves to be proportional to the corresponding conductivity ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{1}$ at different temperatures. In nickel the constant ratio $\frac{{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{1}}{{\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{r1}}$ accounts for the low temperature coefficient of optical properties throughout the visible and near infrared range. In tungsten this constant ratio contributes to the existence of the $x$-point or cross-over wavelength in the spectral emissivity. It is shown that the anomalous skin effect may not be a significant factor in the measured optical properties of a metal like nickel in the range of wavelength where these properties have only a small temperature coefficient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.114.104

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Roberts, S.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1959-04-01
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
104-115
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010425722
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
20.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical Properties of Nickel and Tungsten and Their Interpretation According to Drude's Formula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.114.104
The paper
Roberts, S. (1959). Optical Properties of Nickel and Tungsten and Their Interpretation According to Drude's Formula. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.114.104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.