Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multiple Production of Photons in Quantum Electrodynamics

Mahanthappa, Kalyana T.·1962·Physical Review

Abstract

A formalism intended to evaluate the expectation value of physical quantities directly has been applied to the processes involving multiple production of photons in quantum electrodynamics. This has been achieved by constructing the Green's function which is done by expanding it in terms of hard and soft photon parts of the electromagnetic field. A general treatment of infrared divergence is given. The cross section for $n$-photon production in Coulomb scattering and pair annihilation has been evaluated. The limitation of the expansion of the Green's function in terms of hard and soft photon parts is examined. A plausible generalization regarding the cross section of any primary process in quantum electrodynamics at high energies with $n$-photon emission in the final state is enunciated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.126.329

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. S. N. Gupta, 1955, Phys. Rev., 98, 1502, 10.1103/PhysRev.98.1502 · doi:10.1103/physrev.98.1502
  2. S. N. Gupta, 1955, Phys. Rev., 99, 1015, 10.1103/PhysRev.99.1015 · doi:10.1103/physrev.99.1015
  3. J. Joseph, 1956, Phys. Rev., 103, 481, 10.1103/PhysRev.103.481 · doi:10.1103/physrev.103.481
  4. J. Schwinger, Lectures delivered at the Institute of Theoretical Physics at Brandeis, summer of 1960
  5. J. Schwinger, 1960, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 46, 1401, 10.1073/pnas.46.10.1401 · DOI
  6. J. Schwinger, 1961, J. Math. Phys., 2, 407, 10.1063/1.1703727 · DOI · Paper page
  7. J. Schwinger, 1953, Phys. Rev., 91, 713, 10.1103/PhysRev.91.713 · DOI · Paper page
  8. J. Schwinger, 1953, Phys. Rev., 91, 728, 10.1103/PhysRev.91.728 · doi:10.1103/physrev.91.728
  9. J. Schwinger, 1953, Phys. Rev., 92, 1283, 10.1103/PhysRev.92.1283 · doi:10.1103/physrev.92.1283
  10. J. Schwinger, 1954, Phys. Rev., 93, 615, 10.1103/PhysRev.93.615 · DOI
  11. J. Schwinger, 1954, Phys. Rev., 94, 1362, 10.1103/PhysRev.94.1362 · doi:10.1103/physrev.94.1362
  12. J. Schwinger, 1959, Phys. Rev., 115, 721, 10.1103/PhysRev.115.721 · DOI
  13. J. Schwinger, 1960, Ninth Annual International Conference on High-Energy Physics, Kiev, 1959
  14. J. Schwinger, Lectures on the Theory of Coupled Fields, Harvard University, 1954
  15. J. Schwinger, 1949, Phys. Rev., 76, 790, 10.1103/PhysRev.76.790 · DOI · Paper page
  16. R. G. Newton, 1955, Phys. Rev., 97, 1162, 10.1103/PhysRev.97.1162 · doi:10.1103/physrev.97.1162
  17. R. G. Newton, 1955, Phys. Rev., 98, 1514, 10.1103/PhysRev.98.1514.2 · doi:10.1103/physrev.98.1514.2
  18. L. L. Foldy, 1959, Phys. Rev., 113, 1147, 10.1103/PhysRev.113.1147 · doi:10.1103/physrev.113.1147
  19. D. R. Yennie, 1961, Ann. Phys. (New York), 13, 379, 10.1016/0003-4916(61)90151-8 · DOI
  20. G. Racah, 1934, Nuovo cimento, 11, 461, 10.1007/BF02959918 · doi:10.1007/bf02959918

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mahanthappa, K. T.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1962-04-01
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
329-340
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000808445
Cited by
324
References
0
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.