Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Influence of Covalency upon Rare-Earth Ligand Field Splittings

Axe, J. D., Burns, Gerald·1966·Physical Review

Abstract

Experimental results for the shift with uniaxial stress of the $(^{2}F_{\frac{5}{2}},{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7})\ensuremath{\rightarrow}(^{2}F_{\frac{7}{2}},{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7})$ laser transition in ${\mathrm{Tm}}^{2+}$:Ca${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ and ${\mathrm{Tm}}^{2+}$:Sr${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ are presented. The results, 1.75 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$${(\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{n}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2})}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ and 1.78 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$${(\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{n}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2})}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, are used to calculate the radial dependence of the cubic ligand field splitting. The resulting dependence is somewhat larger than that predicted by the familiar electrostatic model for the splitting. Partially to determine its influence on the above result, we have considered the effect of covalency by means of a semiempirical molecular-orbital model. The overlap of the $4f$ orbitals with the neighboring fluoride ions was calculated using Hartree-Fock wave functions and known internuclear distances. The off-diagonal elements of the interaction Hamiltonian were obtained from the Wolfsberg-Helmholz approximation ${H}_{\mathrm{ij}}=\frac{2{S}_{\mathrm{ij}}({H}_{\mathrm{ii}}+{H}_{\mathrm{jj}})}{2}$. A range of reasonable values for the diagonal elements were obtained by analogy with those necessary to explain iron-series splittings. The largest group overlap of the $4f$ wave function with ${\mathrm{F}}^{1\ensuremath{-}}$ ligands was found to be 3.6% and leads to a sizable (our best estimate in Ca${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ is 50%) covalent contribution to the ligand field splitting. We have also investigated some of the consequences of a covalent contribution of this magnitude. The radial dependence of the covalent part of the energy is greater than for the electrostatic part. The resulting radial dependence is thus in better agreement with experiment. Transferred hyperfine effects are calculated and compared to experiment, but the extent of the agreement is hard to ascertain because of uncertainty of the sign of the experimental quantity and polarization effects. The calculated orbital reduction factor for ${\mathrm{Tm}}^{2+}$:Ca${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ is found to be much smaller than is observed. We have also calculated the expected variation of the ${(\mathrm{rare}\mathrm{earth})}^{3+}\ensuremath{-}{F}^{1\ensuremath{-}}$ overlap as a function of atomic number.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.152.331

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. C. A. Hutchison, 1958, J. Chem. Phys., 29, 754, 10.1063/1.1744587 · doi:10.1063/1.1744587
  2. E. Y. Wong, 1962, J. Chem. Phys., 36, 1889, 10.1063/1.1701285 · doi:10.1063/1.1701285
  3. G. Burns, 1962, Phys. Rev., 128, 2121, 10.1103/PhysRev.128.2121 · doi:10.1103/physrev.128.2121
  4. M. T. Hutchings, 1963, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), 81, 633, 10.1088/0370-1328/81/4/307 · DOI
  5. C. J. Lenander, 1963, J. Chem. Phys., 38, 2750, 10.1063/1.1733584 · doi:10.1063/1.1733584
  6. D. K. Ray, 1963, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 82, 47, 10.1088/0370-1328/82/1/307 · DOI
  7. R. E. Watson, 1964, Phys. Rev., 133, A1571, 10.1103/PhysRev.133.A1571 · doi:10.1103/physrev.133.a1571
  8. G. Burns, 1965, J. Chem. Phys., 42, 377, 10.1063/1.1695703 · doi:10.1063/1.1695703
  9. J. M. Baker, 1963, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 82, 742, 10.1088/0370-1328/82/5/312 · doi:10.1088/0370-1328/82/5/312
  10. R. G. Bessent, 1964, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A285, 430
  11. C. K. Jorgensen, 1963, J. Chem. Phys., 39, 1422, 10.1063/1.1734458 · DOI · Paper page
  12. A. A. Kaplianskii, 1959, Opt. Spectry. (USSR), 7, 406
  13. W. A. Runcimann, 1963, J. Chem. Phys., 38, 279, 10.1063/1.1733484 · doi:10.1063/1.1733484
  14. H. G. Drickamer, 1965, Solid State Physics
  15. Z. J. Kiss, 1962, Phys. Rev., 127, 718, 10.1103/PhysRev.127.718 · DOI · Paper page
  16. W. Hayes, 1961, J. Chem. Phys., 35, 152, 10.1063/1.1732094 · DOI
  17. G. Burns, 1965, Phys. Letters, 19, 98, 10.1016/0031-9163(65)90728-6 · doi:10.1016/0031-9163(65)90728-6
  18. C. J. Ballhausen, 1964, Molecular Orbital Theory
  19. C. J. Ballhausen, 1962, Ligand Field Theory
  20. A. A. Kaplianskii, 1964, Opt. i Spektroskopiya, 16, 1031
  21. B. Bleaney, 1964, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A277, 289, 10.1098/rspa.1964.0023 · DOI
  22. Z. J. Kiss, 1965, Phys. Rev., 137, A1749, 10.1103/PhysRev.137.A1749 · DOI
  23. J. D. Eshelby, 1956, Solid State Physics
  24. J. Friedel, 1955, Phil. Mag., 46, 514, 10.1080/14786440508520587 · DOI
  25. F. D. Murnaghan, 1951, Finite Deformation of an Elastic Solid
  26. H. Brooks, 1955, Impurities and Imperfections
  27. D. R. Huffman, 1960, Phys. Rev., 117, 709, 10.1103/PhysRev.117.709 · DOI
  28. D. Gerlich, 1964, Phys. Rev., 136, A1366, 10.1103/PhysRev.136.A1366 · DOI
  29. T. P. Das, 1965, Phys. Rev., 140, A1957, 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1957 · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1957
  30. J. C. Eisenstein, 1960, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A255, 181, 10.1098/rspa.1960.0061 · doi:10.1098/rspa.1960.0061
  31. J. D. Axe, the Photoduplication Service, ADI Auxiliary Publications Project
  32. P. W. Anderson, 1963, Solid State Physics
  33. R. S. Mulliken, 1949, J. Chem. Phys., 17, 1248, 10.1063/1.1747150 · doi:10.1063/1.1747150
  34. D. H. Templeton, 1954, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76, 5237, 10.1021/ja01649a087 · DOI
  35. A. J. Freeman, 1962, Phys. Rev., 127, 2058, 10.1103/PhysRev.127.2058 · DOI · Paper page
  36. T. R. McGuire, 1964, J. Appl. Phys., 35, 984, 10.1063/1.1713568 · doi:10.1063/1.1713568
  37. C. K. Jorgensen, 1962, Absorption Spectra and Chemical Bonding in Complexes
  38. G. Burns, J. Chem. Phys.
  39. K. W. H. Stevens, 1953, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A219, 542, 10.1098/rspa.1953.0166 · doi:10.1098/rspa.1953.0166
  40. M. Inoue, 1963, Phys. Rev. Letters, 11, 196, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.196 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.11.196
  41. R. Orbach, 1966, Phys. Rev., 143, 168, 10.1103/PhysRev.143.168 · doi:10.1103/physrev.143.168
  42. R. E. Watson, 1961, Phys. Rev. Letters, 6, 277, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.277 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.6.277
  43. A. A. Kaplianskii, 1962, Opt. Spectroskopiya, 13, 882
  44. M. H. Cohen, 1961, Phys. Rev., 122, 1821, 10.1103/PhysRev.122.1821 · DOI
  45. R. G. Schulman, 1962, Phys. Rev., 130, 506, 10.1103/PhysRev.130.506 · doi:10.1103/physrev.130.506
  46. K. Knox, 1962, Phys. Rev., 130, 512, 10.1103/PhysRev.130.512 · doi:10.1103/physrev.130.512
  47. S. Sugano, 1962, Phys. Rev., 130, 517, 10.1103/PhysRev.130.517 · DOI · Paper page
  48. R. E. Watson, 1964, Phys. Rev., 134, A1526, 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A1526 · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.a1526
  49. E. Simanek, 1964, Phys. Status Solidi, 4, 251, 10.1002/pssb.19640040204 · doi:10.1002/pssb.19640040204
  50. J. Hubbard, 1966, Proc. Phys. Soc., 88, 13, 10.1088/0370-1328/88/1/304 · doi:10.1088/0370-1328/88/1/304
  51. S. Sugano, 1965, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 20, 1155, 10.1143/JPSJ.20.1155 · doi:10.1143/jpsj.20.1155
  52. D. W. Hafemeister, 1965, J. Chem. Phys., 43, 795, 10.1063/1.1696846 · doi:10.1063/1.1696846

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Axe, J. D., & Burns, G.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1966-12-02
Volume
152
Issue
1
Pages
331-340
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990739555
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Covalency upon Rare-Earth Ligand Field Splittings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.152.331
The paper
Axe, J. D., & Burns, G. (1966). Influence of Covalency upon Rare-Earth Ligand Field Splittings. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.152.331

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.