Cited by 650Quantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Possibility of Faster-Than-Light Particles

Feinberg, G.·1967·Physical Review

Abstract

We consider the possibility of describing, within the special theory of relativity, particles with spacelike four-momentum, which therefore have velocities greater than that of light in vacuum. The usual objections to such particles are discussed, and they are found to be unconvincing within the framework of relativistic quantum theory. A quantum field theory of noninteracting, spinless, faster-than-light particles is described. The field theory is Lorentz-invariant, but must be quantized with Fermi statistics. The associated particle theory has the property that the particle number is not Lorentz-invariant, and the no-particle state is not Lorentz-invariant either. Nevertheless, the principle of relativity is satisfied. The Lorentz invariance implies a relation between emission and absorption processes, in contradiction to the usual case. Some comments are made about the problem of introducing interactions into the field theory. The limiting velocity is $c$, but a limit has two sides.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.159.1089

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the (1,3) case, an observer would be unable to make any predictions because well-posed problems require data to be specified in the non-local region outside the lightcones.

    “Also in this case, an observer would be unable to make any predictions since, as described in more detail in [15], well-posed problems require data to be specified in the non-local region outside the lightcones.”

    From On the dimensionality of spacetime (1997) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Feinberg, G.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Feinberg, G.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1967-07-25
Volume
159
Issue
5
Pages
1089-1105
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037994760
Cited by
650
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 30
FWCI
15.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
faster-than-light particles, superluminal particles, special relativity, relativistic quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, spinless particles, Fermi statistics, Lorentz invariance, principle of relativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review