Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Classical Noise. V. Noise in Self-Sustained Oscillators

Lax, Melvin·1967·Physical Review

Abstract

A spectrally pure self-sustained oscillator, described by a positive- and negative-impedance series circuit $Z={Z}_{n}+{Z}_{p}$ such that $Z{e}^{i\ensuremath{\omega}t}={e}^{i\ensuremath{\omega}t}Z(\ensuremath{\omega}, D)$, yields a single frequency output depending nonlinearly on a parameter $D$ related to an instantaneous or recent-time-averaged power. The oscillator operates at a point $D={D}_{0}$ at which gains and losses cancel, ${R}_{p}+{R}_{n}\ensuremath{\equiv}R({\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}, {D}_{0})=0$, and at a frequency ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$ determined by ${X}_{p}+{X}_{n}\ensuremath{\equiv}X({\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}, {D}_{0})=0$. Since $R=0$, the oscillator linewidth vanishes in the absence of noise. We endow the resistances ${R}_{p}$ and ${R}_{n}$ with Langevin noise sources. Amplitude fluctuations produce a broad additive background. The oscillator is unstable against phase fluctuations, which broaden the signal into finite width. A quasilinear treatment, well above threshold, demonstrates that the phase executes a Brownian motion. If $\frac{\ensuremath{\partial}R}{\ensuremath{\partial}\ensuremath{\omega}}\ensuremath{\ne}0$ or $\frac{\ensuremath{\partial}X}{\ensuremath{\partial}D}\ensuremath{\ne}0$ at the operating point, phase and amplitude fluctuations are coupled. Nevertheless, we succeed in calculating the linewidth and proving that it is independent of the rate at which power (or $D$) relaxes. A comparison is made with the "linear" treatment of oscillators as amplified noise. A reduced random process is set up, valid for time intervals obeying ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}\ensuremath{\Delta}t\ensuremath{\gg}1$. Although the phase of the oscillator involves a nonlinear, nonstationary action on the Gaussian input noise, it is shown that well above threshold, for the reduced process, the phase is again properly described as a Gaussian variable subject to the expected Brownian-motion diffusion. For all well-designed oscillators, even near threshold, we establish that the reduced random process is that of a rotating-wave van der Pol oscillator. A comparison is made between quasilinear solutions of the rotating-wave van der Pol oscillator and exact solutions of the Fokker-Planck equation computed in the next paper, VI, in this series. For intensity fluctuations it is demonstrated that quasilinear methods are quantitatively valid away from the threshold region and qualitatively valid near threshold, provided that the quasilinear approximation is made in the correct variable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.160.290

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Lax, M.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1967-08-10
Volume
160
Issue
2
Pages
290-307
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042623116
Cited by
333
References
0
FWCI
12.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classical Noise. V. Noise in Self-Sustained Oscillators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.160.290
The paper
Lax, M. (1967). Classical Noise. V. Noise in Self-Sustained Oscillators. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.160.290

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.