The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Determination of Sources of the Electro-Optic Effect in LiNbO3and LiTaO3
Abstract
The electro-optic effect in crystals can be separated into two types of microscopic interaction: an electron-lattice contribution in which the applied field produces a lattice displacement, which in turn modifies the electronic polarizability (or refractive index), and a direct electron-field contribution in which the applied field modifies the electronic polarizability in the absence of lattice displacements. The latter contribution in LiNb${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ and LiTa${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ can be estimated from second-harmonic-generation experiments by Miller and Savage, and accounts for less than 10% of the refractive-index change. Each polar-lattice optic mode in LiNb${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ and LiTa${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ ($4{A}_{1}+9E$) contributes separately to the electro-optic effect an amount proportional to the product of its Raman-scattering efficiency and infrared oscillator strength. We have measured the absolute scattering efficiencies for LiNb${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ and LiTa${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$. The oscillator strengths for LiNb${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ have been measured by Barker and Loudon. We find that the dominant contribution to the electro-optic coefficients ${r}_{33}$ and ${r}_{13}$ comes from the lowest-frequency ${A}_{1}$ mode; and to ${r}_{42}$ and ${r}_{22}$ from the next lowest $E$ mode. These same modes dominate the low-frequency dielectric constant. The absolute values of ${r}_{13}$, ${r}_{33}$, ${r}_{42}$, and ${r}_{22}$ calculated from the combined Raman, infrared, and second-harmonic-generation data are in excellent agreement with the electro-optic coefficients measured directly by Turner. In addition to the absolute scattering efficiencies for all the transverse and longitudinal modes in LiTa${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ and LiNb${\mathrm{O}}_{3}$, we have also determined the mode frequencies and linewidths, which are important in calculating Raman gain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrooptical generation and detection of femtosecond electrical transients
Auston, D. H., & Nuss, M. C. (1988) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.114 · Cited by 347
BARKER, A. S., & LOUDON, R. (1972) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.44.18 · Cited by 314
Raman lasing and soliton mode-locking in lithium niobate microresonators
Yu, M., Okawachi, Y., Cheng, R., Wang, C., Zhang, M., Gaeta, A. L., & Lončar, M. (2020) · Light: Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/s41377-020-0246-7 · Cited by 149
Raman scattering efficiency inLiTaO3andLiNbO3crystals
Sanna, S., Neufeld, S., Rüsing, M., Berth, G., Zrenner, A., & Schmidt, W. G. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.224302 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaminow, I. P., & Johnston, W. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1967-08-15
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 519-522
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091875210
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Determination of Sources of the Electro-Optic Effect in LiNbO3and LiTaO3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.160.519
- The paper
- Kaminow, I. P., & Johnston, W. D. (1967). Quantitative Determination of Sources of the Electro-Optic Effect in LiNbO3and LiTaO3. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.160.519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.