The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-Consistent Model of Hydrogen Chemisorption
Abstract
The chemisorption of a hydrogen atom on a transition-metal surface is treated theoretically on the basis of the Anderson Hamiltonian in Hartree-Fock approximation, which includes the interelectronic interaction within the $1s$ orbital. One-electron theory is shown to be inadequate for this problem. The localized states which may occur are discussed. A simple expression for the chemisorption energy $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ is obtained, and a variational method is given for obtaining its self-consistent value. The metal eigenfunctions enter $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ only through a function $\ensuremath{\Delta}(\ensuremath{\epsilon})$, and the foregoing results are exemplified and applied when this function is semielliptical. When the band is half-filled, a single analytic formula for the one-electron part of $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ is obtained, in accord with the Kohn-Majumdar theorem. With some further assumptions, $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ and the charge on the atom are calculated for adsorption on Ti, Cr, Ni, and Cu. The values of the hopping integral between the $1s$ orbital and a neighboring metal $d$ orbital required to fit the experimental $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ are found to be similar and are reasonable. The correct prediction that ${|\ensuremath{\Delta}E|}_{\mathrm{Ni}}>{|\ensuremath{\Delta}E|}_{\mathrm{Cu}}$ is believed to be significant. A suggestive correlation is found between observations of catalytic ortho-para hydrogen interconversion on Pd-Au alloys and a rigidband calculation of $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Towards the computational design of solid catalysts
Nørskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Rossmeisl, J., & Christensen, C. H. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.121 · Cited by 4,161
Theoretical surface science and catalysis—calculations and concepts
Hammer, B., & Nørskov, J. K. (2000) · Advances in Catalysis · doi:10.1016/s0360-0564(02)45013-4 · Cited by 3,972
Interaction of hydrogen with solid surfaces
Christmann, K. (1988) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/0167-5729(88)90009-x · Cited by 1,120
Nørskov, J. K. (1982) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.26.2875 · Cited by 462
Metzger, R. M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500459d · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- NEWNS, D. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1969-02-15
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1123-1135
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013998255
- Cited by
- 1,632
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-Consistent Model of Hydrogen Chemisorption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.178.1123
- The paper
- NEWNS, D. M. (1969). Self-Consistent Model of Hydrogen Chemisorption. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.178.1123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.