The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Non-Lagrangian Models of Current Algebra
Abstract
An alternative is proposed to specific Lagrangian models of current algebra. In this alternative there are no explicit canonical fields, and operator products at the same point [say, ${j}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}(x){j}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}(x)$] have no meaning. Instead, it is assumed that scale invariance is a broken symmetry of strong interactions, as proposed by Kastrup and Mack. Also, a generalization of equal-time commutators is assumed: Operator products at short distances have expansions involving local fields multiplying singular functions. It is assumed that the dominant fields are the $\mathrm{SU}(3)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{SU}(3)$ currents and the $\mathrm{SU}(3)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{SU}(3)$ multiplet containing the pion field. It is assumed that the pion field scales like a field of dimension $\ensuremath{\Delta}$, where $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ is unspecified within the range $1\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\Delta}<4$; the value of $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ is a consequence of renormalization. These hypotheses imply several qualitative predictions: The second Weinberg sum rule does not hold for the difference of the ${K}^{*}$ and axial-${K}^{*}$ propagators, even for exact $\mathrm{SU}(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{SU}(2)$; electromagnetic corrections require one subtraction proportional to the $I=1$, ${I}_{z}=0\ensuremath{\sigma}$ field; $\ensuremath{\eta}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}3\ensuremath{\pi}$ and ${\ensuremath{\pi}}_{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2\ensuremath{\gamma}$ are allowed by current algebra. Octet dominance of nonleptonic weak processes can be understood, and a new form of superconvergence relation is deduced as a consequence. A generalization of the Bjorken limit is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gasser, J., & Leutwyler, H. (1982) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(82)90035-7 · Cited by 1,753
Aspects of the grand unification of strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions
Buras, A. J., Ellis, J., Gaillard, M. K., & Nanopoulos, D. V. (1978) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90214-6 · Cited by 1,051
The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applications
Poland, D., Rychkov, S., & Vichi, A. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015002 · Cited by 760
Quantum Gravity in Everyday Life: General Relativity as an Effective Field Theory
Burgess, C. P. (2004) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2004-5 · Cited by 748
Einstein gravity as a symmetry-breaking effect in quantum field theory
Adler, S. L. (1982) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.729 · Cited by 699
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, K. G.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1969-03-25
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1499-1512
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2232221069
- Cited by
- 2,038
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-Lagrangian Models of Current Algebra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.179.1499
- The paper
- Wilson, K. G. (1969). Non-Lagrangian Models of Current Algebra. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.179.1499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.