Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 672

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Energy Production in Stars

Bethe, H. A.·1939·Physical Review

Abstract

It is shown that the most important source of energy in ordinary stars is the reactions of carbon and nitrogen with protons. These reactions form a cycle in which the original nucleus is reproduced, viz. ${\mathrm{C}}^{12}$+H=${\mathrm{N}}^{13}$, ${\mathrm{N}}^{13}={\mathrm{C}}^{13}+{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{+}$, ${\mathrm{C}}^{13}$+H=${\mathrm{N}}^{14}$, ${\mathrm{N}}^{14}$+H=${\mathrm{O}}^{15}$, ${\mathrm{O}}^{15}={\mathrm{N}}^{15}+{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{+}$, ${\mathrm{N}}^{15}$+H=${\mathrm{C}}^{12}$ +${\mathrm{He}}^{4}$. Thus carbon and nitrogen merely serve as catalysts for the combination of four protons (and two electrons) into an $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-particle (\textsection{}7).The carbon-nitrogen reactions are unique in their cyclical character (\textsection{}8). For all nuclei lighter than carbon, reaction with protons will lead to the emission of an $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-particle so that the original nucleus is permanently destroyed. For all nuclei heavier than fluorine, only radiative capture of the protons occurs, also destroying the original nucleus. Oxygen and fluorine reactions mostly lead back to nitrogen. Besides, these heavier nuclei react much more slowly than C and N and are therefore unimportant for the energy production.The agreement of the carbon-nitrogen reactions with observational data (\textsection{}7, 9) is excellent. In order to give the correct energy evolution in the sun, the central temperature of the sun would have to be 18.5 million degrees while integration of the Eddington equations gives 19. For the brilliant star Y Cygni the corresponding figures are 30 and 32. This good agreement holds for all bright stars of the main sequence, but, of course, not for giants.For fainter stars, with lower central temperatures, the reaction $\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{H}=\mathrm{D}+{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{+}$ and the reactions following it, are believed to be mainly responsible for the energy production. (\textsection{}10)It is shown further (\textsection{}5-6) that no elements heavier than ${\mathrm{He}}^{4}$ can be built up in ordinary stars. This is due to the fact, mentioned above, that all elements up to boron are disintegrated by proton bombardment ($\ensuremath{\alpha}$-emission!) rather than built up (by radiative capture). The instability of ${\mathrm{Be}}^{8}$ reduces the formation of heavier elements still further. The production of neutrons in stars is likewise negligible. The heavier elements found in stars must therefore have existed already when the star was formed.Finally, the suggested mechanism of energy production is used to draw conclusions about astrophysical problems, such as the mass-luminosity relation (\textsection{}10), the stability against temperature changes (\textsection{}11), and stellar evolution (\textsection{}12).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.55.434

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 672

Metadata

Authors
Bethe, H. A.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1939-03-01
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
434-456
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051756823
Cited by
672
References
0
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy Production in Stars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.55.434
The paper
Bethe, H. A. (1939). Energy Production in Stars. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.55.434

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.