The DOI matches its Crossref record.
General Relativity and Flat Space. I
Abstract
Within the framework of the general theory of relativity, it is proposed to introduce at each point of space-time a Euclidean metric tensor ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$ in addition to the usual Riemannian metric tensor ${g}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$. In this way one imparts tensor character to quantities which in the usual form of the theory do not have it. For example, one can obtain a gravitational energy-momentum density tensor in place of the usual pseudo-tensor. Furthermore one can impose four additional covariant conditions on the gravitational field and thus restrict the form of the solution for the field corresponding to a given physical situation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449
Pitts, J. B. (2010) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-009-0874-y · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosen, N.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1940-01-15
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-150
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091136308
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.