The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic Shielding of Nuclei in Molecules
Abstract
An expression is developed for the magnetic field at a nucleus resulting from the application of an external magnetic field to a polyatomic molecule which has no resultant electron orbital or spin angular momenta in the absence of the external field. The field at the nucleus is not the same as the externally applied field because of the field arising from the motion of the electrons in the molecule. The expression for the electron contribution to the magnetic field is shown to consist of two parts. The first is a simple term that is similar to the diamagnetic correction developed by Lamb for atoms. The second is a complicated one arising from second-order paramagnetism and is analogous to the term dependent on the high frequency matrix elements in the theory of molecular diamagnetism. Under certain circumstances the second-order paramagnetic term can become quite large. Since both of these terms are altered when the same nucleus is in different molecules, they at least partially and perhaps completely explain the chemical effect that has been reported by various observers in measurements of nuclear moments. For linear molecules, the second-order paramagnetic term is shown to be directly related to the experimentally measurable spin-rotational magnetic interaction constant of the molecule. This relation is particularly valuable in the important case of molecular hydrogen where it is shown that the correction for second-order paramagnetism is -0.56\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$. When this is added to the Lamb-type term as calculated by Anderson, the total magnetic shielding constant for molecular ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}$ becomes 2.68\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lamb, W. E. (1941) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.60.817 · Cited by 307
On the Magnetic Field of a Rotating Molecule
Wick, G. C. (1948) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.73.51 · Cited by 145
�ber das magnetische Moment eines rotierenden Wasserstoffmolek�ls
Wick, G. C. (1933) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1007/bf01330775 · Cited by 80
Cited by
Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models
Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B., & Cammi, R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9904009 · Cited by 16,868
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker
Wang, Y., & Liu, T. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.25358 · Cited by 878
TAYLOR, B. N., PARKER, W. H., & LANGENBERG, D. N. (1969) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.41.375 · Cited by 614
Theory of Nuclear Magnetic Shielding in Molecules. I. Long-Range Dipolar Shielding of Protons
McConnell, H. M. (1957) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1743676 · Cited by 579
Ehrenson, S., Brownlee, R. T. C., & Taft, R. W. (1973) · Progress in Physical Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9780470171899.ch1 · Cited by 422
Interpretation of Knight Shifts and Susceptibilities of Transition Metals: Platinum
Clogston, A. M., Jaccarino, V., & Yafet, Y. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.a650 · Cited by 349
Bohmann, J. A., Weinhold, F., & Farrar, T. C. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.474464 · Cited by 306
Theory of analytical energy derivatives for the variational quantum eigensolver
Mitarai, K., Nakagawa, Y. O., & Mizukami, W. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013129 · Cited by 76
Perspectives of relativistic quantum chemistry: the negative energy cat smiles
Liu, W. (2012) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c1cp21718f · Cited by 76
Non-linear ring currents: effect of strong magnetic fields on π-electron circulation
Soncini, A., & Fowler, P. W. (2004) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2004.10.110 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramsey, N. F.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1950-06-15
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 699-703
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012130053
- Cited by
- 1,427
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.