Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 614

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination ofeh, Using Macroscopic Quantum Phase Coherence in Superconductors: Implications for Quantum Electrodynamics and the Fundamental Physical Constants

TAYLOR, B. N., PARKER, W. H., LANGENBERG, D. N.·1969·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

The implications of the new determination of $\frac{e}{h}$ using the ac Josephson effect in superconductors for both quantum electrodynamics (QED) and our knowledge of the fundamental physical constants are analyzed in detail. The implications for QED are investigated by first deriving a value of the fine structure constant $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ from experimental input data which do not require the use of QED theory for their analysis. These include the Josephson-effect value of $\frac{e}{h}$, the Faraday constant, the gyromagnetic ratio of the proton, the magnetic moment of the proton in units of the nuclear magneton, the ratio of the ampere as maintained by the United States National Bureau of Standards to the absolute ampere, and certain accurately known auxiliary constants. This is done by critically reevaluating all of the experimental data presently available on these quantities and applying the standard techniques of a least squares adjustment, including tests for imcompatibility. The value of $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ so obtained is then used to evaluate the theoretical expressions for the Lamb shift and fine structure splitting in hydrogen, deuterium, and ionized helium, the hyperfine splitting in hydrogen, muonium, and positronium, and the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron and muon. These theoretical values are compared with critically reexamined experimental values, thus providing a test of QED in which a priori information from QED itself is not essential. The consequences of the new measurement of $\frac{e}{h}$ for our present knowledge of the fundamental physical constants are demonstrated by deriving new "best" values for the fundamental constants from a critically selected subset of all the available data. In addition to providing a consistent set of constants, this analysis focuses attention on areas in which there remain important questions which require clarification. The experimental and theoretical work necessary for the resolution of these questions is discussed, with emphasis on ways in which the study of quantum phase coherence effects in low temperature superfluid systems can make significant contributions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.41.375

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

See all 614

Metadata

Authors
TAYLOR, B. N., PARKER, W. H., & LANGENBERG, D. N.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1969-07-01
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
375-496
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023195285
Cited by
614
References
66
FWCI
186.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination ofeh, Using Macroscopic Quantum Phase Coherence in Superconductors: Implications for Quantum Electrodynamics and the Fundamental Physical Constants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.41.375
The paper
TAYLOR, B. N., PARKER, W. H., & LANGENBERG, D. N. (1969). Determination ofeh, Using Macroscopic Quantum Phase Coherence in Superconductors: Implications for Quantum Electrodynamics and the Fundamental Physical Constants. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.41.375

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.