Theory of auger ejection of electrons from metals by ions
Abstract
Electrons ejected from atomically clean metals by slow ions of the noble gases arise in Auger transitions which involve either the direct neutralization of the ion or the de-excitation of an excited atom. A theory of these processes is presented in which the form of the distribution in energy and relative total yield, ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{i}$, of ejected electrons are derived. Matrix elements are not evaluated from first principles, but specific use of experimental results at two points in the theory leads to a determination of the dependence of the matrix element on distance between the atomic particle and the metal surface and the angle between the excited electron's velocity and the surface normal. Inclusion of the effects of variation of atomic energy levels near the metal surface and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle makes it possible to account in some detail for the experimentally observed energy distributions as well as the variation of these and of ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{i}$ with ion kinetic energy. The effect upon the resonance ionization and neutralization processes of the variation of atomic energy levels near the metal surface has also been investigated. The theory predicts a critical distance from the metal surface outside which resonance neutralization and inside which resonance ionization are possible. It has also been possible for the specific case of noble gas ions on tungsten, used as an illustrative example, to determine the relative proportion of e…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to Hagstrum theory, an increase in work function reduces ion induced secondary electron yield, which explains a reduction in sensitivity.
“According to the Hagstrum theory, work function increase reduces IISEY (cf.eq. ( 4)), which explains reduction of the sensitivity.”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [98]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jousten, K., Boineau, F., Bundaleski, N., Illgen, C., Setina, J., Teodoro, O. M. N. D., Vicar, M., & Wüest, M. (2020) · Vacuum · doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109545 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hagstrum, H. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1954-10-15
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 336-365
- ISSN
- 0031-899X
- Cited by
- 1,288
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review