Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 509

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Atomic Energy Levels for the Thomas-Fermi and Thomas-Fermi-Dirac Potential

Latter, Richard·1955·Physical Review

Abstract

The eigenvalues of the Schr\"odinger equation have been obtained for the Thomas-Fermi and Thomas-Fermi-Dirac atomic potentials. Electron self-interactions were taken into account by modifying the potentials to give asymptotically the field of a unit charge. All levels were treated from $1s$ to $7d$ for a range of $Z$-values sufficient to permit easy interpolation. It was found that the energies, for either the Thomas-Fermi or Thomas-Fermi-Dirac potentials, agree in general as well with experimental ionization energies as the Hartree or Hartree-Fock approximations. Applications of the statistical potential to other atomic problems are indicated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.99.510

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 509

Metadata

Authors
Latter, R.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1955-07-15
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
510-519
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086628812
Cited by
509
References
0
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atomic Energy Levels for the Thomas-Fermi and Thomas-Fermi-Dirac Potential. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.99.510
The paper
Latter, R. (1955). Atomic Energy Levels for the Thomas-Fermi and Thomas-Fermi-Dirac Potential. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.99.510

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.