The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neutral-atom electron binding energies from relaxed-orbital relativistic Hartree-Fock-Slater calculations 2 ≤ Z ≤ 106
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
A Simplification of the Hartree-Fock Method
Slater, J. C. (1951) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.81.385 · Cited by 4,584
Reevaluation of X-Ray Atomic Energy Levels
BEARDEN, J. A., & BURR, A. F. (1967) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.39.125 · Cited by 2,041
The Effect of Retardation on the Interaction of Two Electrons
Breit, G. (1929) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.34.553 · Cited by 860
Relativistic calculation of atomic structures
Grant, I. P. (1970) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018737000101191 · Cited by 839
Polarization Effects in the Positron Theory
Uehling, E. A. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.48.55 · Cited by 673
Atomic Energy Levels for the Thomas-Fermi and Thomas-Fermi-Dirac Potential
Latter, R. (1955) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.99.510 · Cited by 509
Relativistic self-consistent field program for atoms and ions
Liberman, D. A., Cromer, D. T., & Waber, J. T. (1971) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/0010-4655(71)90020-8 · Cited by 460
Relativistic Self-Consistent-Field Theory for Closed-Shell Atoms
Kim, Y. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.154.17 · Cited by 348
Numerical evaluation of the 1S12-state radiative level shift
Mohr, P. J. (1974) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(74)90399-6 · Cited by 347
Cited by
The Ame2003 atomic mass evaluation
Audi, G., Wapstra, A. H., & Thibault, C. (2003) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003 · Cited by 4,796
Recent trends in the determination of nuclear masses
Lunney, D., Pearson, J. M., & Thibault, C. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.1021 · Cited by 759
Chung, H.-K., Chen, M. H., Morgan, W. L., Ralchenko, Y., & Lee, R. W. (2005) · High Energy Density Physics · doi:10.1016/j.hedp.2005.07.001 · Cited by 721
Self-citationThe Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation
Audi, G., Wang, M., Wapstra, A. H., Kondev, F. G., MacCormick, M., Xu, X., & Pfeiffer, B. (2012) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/002 · Cited by 580
IMPACT OF A REVISED 25 Mg( p , γ) 26 Al REACTION RATE ON THE OPERATION OF THE Mg-Al CYCLE
Straniero, O., Imbriani, G., Strieder, F., Bemmerer, D., Broggini, C., Caciolli, A., Corvisiero, P., Costantini, H., Cristallo, S., DiLeva, A., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/2/100 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, K.-N., Aoyagi, M., Chen, M. H., Crasemann, B., & Mark, H.
- Venue
- Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1976-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 243-291
- ISSN
- 0092-640X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155731846
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutral-atom electron binding energies from relaxed-orbital relativistic Hartree-Fock-Slater calculations 2 ≤ Z ≤ 106. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0092-640x(76)90027-9
- The paper
- Huang, K.-N., Aoyagi, M., Chen, M. H., Crasemann, B., & Mark, H. (1976). Neutral-atom electron binding energies from relaxed-orbital relativistic Hartree-Fock-Slater calculations 2 ≤ Z ≤ 106. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-640x(76)90027-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
