Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Statistical accuracy in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

Koppel, Dennis E.·1974·Physical Review A

Abstract

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy is a promising technique for the study of chemical kinetics and diffusion processes in small, well-defined sample volumes. Laser-induced fluorescence is used as a specific highly sensitive probe of concentration, permitting the analysis of the characteristic time dependence of spontaneous concentration fluctuations. We present here a quantitative analysis of the statistical and systematic errors inherent in such an experiment. Theoretical expressions are derived for the signal-to-noise ratio for various operational definitions of the photocount correlation signal. It is shown that the critical parameter governing the statistical accuracy of the experiment is not the total number of photocounts per correlation time, but (when background fluorescence is negligible) the photocounts per correlation time, per fluorescent molecule, a parameter independent of the number of fluorescent molecules in the sample volume. Comparisons are made with parallel results for laser-light scattering experiments derived by other authors. Finally, we consider the effects of background fluorescence, photolysis, and other deviations from ideality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.10.1938

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Koppel, D. E.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1974-12-01
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
1938-1945
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064757943
Cited by
450
References
0
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical accuracy in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.10.1938
The paper
Koppel, D. E. (1974). Statistical accuracy in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.10.1938

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.