Quantum adiabatic algorithm design using reinforcement learning
Open accessAbstract
Quantum algorithm design plays a crucial role in exploiting the computational advantage of quantum devices. Here we develop a deep-reinforcement-learning based approach for quantum adiabatic algorithm design. Our approach is generically applicable to a class of problems with solution hard-to-find but easy-to-verify, e.g., searching and NP-complete problems. We benchmark this approach in Grover-search and 3-SAT problems, and find that the adiabatic algorithm obtained by our RL approach leads to significant improvement in the resultant success probability. In application to Grover search, our RL design automatically produces an adiabatic quantum algorithm that has the quadratic speedup. We find for all our studied cases that quantitatively the RL-designed algorithm has a better performance compared to the analytically constructed nonlinear Hamiltonian path when the encoding Hamiltonian is solvable, and that this RL-design approach remains applicable even when the nonlinear Hamiltonian path is not analytically available. In 3-SAT we find RL design has fascinating transferability---the adiabatic algorithm obtained by training on a specific choice of clause number leads to better performance consistently over the linear algorithm on different clause numbers. These findings suggest the applicability of reinforcement learning for automated quantum adiabatic algorithm design. Further considering the established complexity equivalence of circuit and adiabatic quantum algorithms, we expect the RL-designed adiabatic algorithm to inspire novel circuit algorithms as well. Our approach is potentially applicable to different quantum hardware from trapped ions and optical lattices to superconducting-qubit devices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Architecture search approaches that adapt the ansatz of a variational approach may take an existing ansatz as a starting point or be more generally created.
“Likewise, architecture search approaches that adapt the ansatz of the variational approach may take an existing ansatz as a starting point [86, 89, 155] or be more generally created [88, 96, 97, 151, 152].”
From Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
The Introduction (p. 2) describes reinforcement learning that automatically designs a quantum adiabatic algorithm by finding a Hamiltonian path, supporting the general idea of automated design. But the cited work does not describe architecture search that creates or adapts the ansatz of a variational approach; its search object is an adiabatic path, as specified in §A (p. 2). (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHighly problem-specific ansätze to VQAs, not based on standard methods such as QAOA or VQE, and their effect on performance and resulting energy landscapes have been studied.
“Highly problem-specific ansÃďtze to VQAs, which are not based on standard methods such as QAOA or VQE, and their effect on performance and resulting energy landscapes have been studied [83, 88, 151, 152].”
From Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
The optimization-problem section (p. 2) describes a problem-dependent, parameterized Hamiltonian path, and the introduction (p. 2) reports its effect on algorithm performance. But the paper studies reinforcement-learned adiabatic algorithms, not VQA ansätze; its energy-spectrum analysis (p. 5) does not establish a claim about VQA energy landscapes. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMachine learning techniques have been applied for program generation and architecture search.
“Besides finding reusable parameters and optimizing parameters, machine learning techniques have been applied for ansatz search purposes, e.g., for finding mixer Hamiltonians for the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz [114], and for program generation and architecture search [88, 97, 151, 152].”
From Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
The Introduction (pp. 1–2) describes using reinforcement learning to design a quantum adiabatic algorithm by searching for an optimal Hamiltonian path, supporting automated algorithm design as an example. The paper does not describe generating programs or searching program or circuit architectures; its search is over paths for fixed Hamiltonians (Section II.A, p. 2). (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAdapted annealing schedules, reverse annealing, and spatially inhomogeneous driving represent possible adaptations to the annealing procedure in QA.
“In this regard, adapted annealing schedules [27, 88], reverse annealing [62], as well as spatially inhomogeneous driving [136] represent according possible adaptations.”
From Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
Within QA, machine learning has been utilized to identify optimized annealing schedules with reinforcement learning.
“Within QA, machine learning has been utilized to identify optimized annealing schedules with reinforcement learning [88] and a combination of Monte Carlo Tree Search with neural nets [27].”
From Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14236 · Cited by 30,357 · see citing works
<i>Quantum Computation and Quantum Information</i>
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895 · see citing works
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,449 · see citing works
Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24270 · Cited by 9,084 · see citing works
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830 · see citing works
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720 · see citing works
Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1999) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144598347011 · Cited by 3,904 · see citing works
Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator
Bernien, H., Schwartz, S., Keesling, A., Levine, H., Omran, A., Pichler, H., Choi, S., Zibrov, A. S., Endres, M., Greiner, M., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24622 · Cited by 2,460 · see citing works
Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook
Devoret, M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231930 · Cited by 2,122 · see citing works
A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S., Lapan, J., Lundgren, A., & Preda, D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057726 · Cited by 2,056 · see citing works
Albash, T., & Lidar, D. A. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015002 · Cited by 1,546 · see citing works
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Wilson, E. B. (1916) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.44.1136.500.b · Cited by 1,322 · see citing works
Transitionless quantum driving
Berry, M. (2009) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/36/365303 · Cited by 1,039 · see citing works
On the theory of dynamic programming
Bellman, R. (1952) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.38.8.716 · Cited by 998 · see citing works
Quantum computational supremacy
Harrow, A. W., & Montanaro, A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23458 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Quantum search by local adiabatic evolution
Roland, J., & Cerf, N. J. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042308 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Shortcut to Adiabatic Passage in Two- and Three-Level Atoms
Chen, X., Lizuain, I., Ruschhaupt, A., Guéry-Odelin, D., & Muga, J. G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.123003 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Wang, H., Qin, J., Ding, X., Chen, M.-C., Chen, S., You, X., He, Y., Jiang, X. Q., You, L., Wang, Z., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.250503 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits
Neill, C., Roushan, P., Kechedzhi, K., Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V., Megrant, A., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., Arya, K., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao4309 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Miller, G. L. (1996) · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Adiabatic Quantum Computation Is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation
Aharonov, D., van Dam, W., Kempe, J., Landau, Z., Lloyd, S., & Regev, O. (2008) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/080734479 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Analog analogue of a digital quantum computation
Farhi, E., & Gutmann, S. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.2403 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Universal Quantum Control through Deep Reinforcement Learning
Niu, M. Y., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V., & Neven, H. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0141-3 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Reinforcement Learning in Different Phases of Quantum Control
Bukov, M., Day, A. G. R., Sels, D., Weinberg, P., Polkovnikov, A., & Mehta, P. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031086 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Observation of topological phenomena in a programmable lattice of 1,800 qubits
King, A. D., Carrasquilla, J., Raymond, J., Ozfidan, I., Andriyash, E., Berkley, A. J., Reis, M., Lanting, T. M., Harris, R., Altomare, F., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0410-x · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Unsupervised Machine Learning on a Hybrid Quantum Computer
Otterbach, J. S., Manenti, R., Alidoust, N., Bestwick, A., Block, M., Bloom, B., Caldwell, S., Didier, N., Fried, E. S., Hong, S., et al. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.05771 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Co-designing a scalable quantum computer with trapped atomic ions
Brown, K. R., Kim, J., & Monroe, C. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.34 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Genuine 12-Qubit Entanglement on a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Gong, M., Chen, M.-C., Zheng, Y., Wang, S., Zha, C., Deng, H., Yan, Z., Rong, H., Wu, Y., Li, S., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.110501 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum sampling problems, BosonSampling and quantum supremacy
Lund, A. P., Bremner, M. J., & Ralph, T. C. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0018-2 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Proceedings 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
(2001) · doi:10.1109/clustr.2001 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Stern–Gerlach detection of neutral-atom qubits in a state-dependent optical lattice
Wu, T.-Y., Kumar, A., Giraldo, F., & Weiss, D. S. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0478-8 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Neural-network-designed pulse sequences for robust control of singlet-triplet qubits
Yang, X.-C., Yung, M., & Wang, X. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.042324 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Analog nature of quantum adiabatic unstructured search
Slutskii, M., Albash, T., Barash, L., & Hen, I. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab51f9 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Exact Equivalence between Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm and Quantum Circuit Algorithm
Yu, H., Huang, Y., & Wu, B. (2018) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/35/11/110303 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Quantum simulations come of age
Bloch, I. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0371-x · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [15]M. Gong, M.-C. Chen, Y. Zheng, S. Wang, C. Zha, H. Deng, Z. Yan, H. Rong, Y. Wu, S. Li, et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02292 (2018). · arXiv
- [18]H. Wang, J. Qin, X. Ding, M.-C. Chen, S. Chen, X. You, Y.-M. He, X. Jiang, L. You, Z. Wang, et al., Physical review letters 123 , 250503 (2019).
- [38]M. Jarret, B. Lackey, A. Liu, and K. Wan, arXiv e-prints arXiv:1810.04686 (2018), 1810.04686. · arXiv
- [39]M. Slutskii, T. Albash, L. Barash, and I. Hen, arXiv eprints arXiv:1904.04420 (2019), 1904.04420. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study
Gemeinhardt, F., Garmendia, A., Wimmer, M., Weder, B., & Leymann, F. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3620668 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“…[51], [75], [76, 99], [141], [143], [146] Measurement [122], [125] Grover-search [52], [118] Other gate-based approaches [15], [16], [24], [94] Hamiltonians [62, 111, 136], [136] Space [136] Time [27], [62, 88] Other approaches [19, 63] sensitivity of QAOA to initial parameter settings [137].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Lin, J., Lai, Z. Y., & Li, X.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2020-05-18
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9926
- 2469-9934
- OpenAlex
- W3022968469
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Basic Research Program of China (2017YFA0304204)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11774067, 11934002)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (19ZR1471500)
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (2019SHZDZX04)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- deep reinforcement learning, Grover's algorithm, 3-SAT, nonlinear Hamiltonian, transferability, NP-complete problems, quadratic speedup
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review