Measurement of electric-field noise from interchangeable samples with a trapped-ion sensor
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate the use of a single trapped ion as a sensor to probe electric-field noise from interchangeable test surfaces. As proof of principle, we measure the magnitude and distance dependence of electric-field noise from two ion-trap-like samples with patterned Au electrodes. This trapped-ion sensor could be combined with other surface characterization tools to help elucidate the mechanisms that give rise to electric-field noise from ion-trap surfaces. Such noise presents a significant hurdle for performing large-scale trapped-ion quantum computations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This flexibility of ion placement has advantages in many areas of ion-trap physics, for instance, in placing ions in anti-nodes of optical cavities, or sampling field noise from surfaces of interest.
“This flexibility of ion placement has advantages in many areas of ion-trap physics, for instance, in placing ions in anti-nodes of optical cavities58, or sampling field noise from surfaces of interest59,60.”
From Penning micro-trap for quantum computing (2024) · cites this paper as [60]
Cites
Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions
Wineland, D. J., Monroe, C., Itano, W. M., Leibfried, D., King, B. E., & Meekhof, D. M. (1998) · Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · doi:10.6028/jres.103.019 · Cited by 1,497 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Penning micro-trap for quantum computing
Jain, S., Sägesser, T., Hrmo, P., Torkzaban, C., Stadler, M., Oswald, R., Axline, C., Bautista-Salvador, A., Ospelkaus, C., Kienzler, D., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07111-x · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“We note that the coherence”
- Authors
- McKay, K. S., Hite, D. A., Kent, P. D., Kotler, S., Leibfried, D., Slichter, D. H., Wilson, A. C., & Pappas, D. P.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Hite, Dustin A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2021-11-18
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9926
- 2469-9934
- PMC
- PMC11194989
- OpenAlex
- W3127954184
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- University of Colorado Boulder (70NANB18H006)
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Keywords
- electric field noise, ion trap, gold electrode, surface characterization, distance dependence, trapped-ion quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review