Cited by 20Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

Quantum error correction with higher Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes: Minimal measurements and linear optics

Open access
Schmidt, Frank, van Loock, Peter·2022·Physical Review A

Abstract

With a focus on fault tolerance, the authors propose multiple schemes to diagnose errors, or obtain syndrome information, in quantum error-correction codes. They show that when GKP codes are concatenated with a stabilizer code, the number of measurements needed to make a full error diagnosis is lower than previously thought. Their methods use simple linear optical operations combined with ``off-line'' squeezing, rather than the noisy in-line squeezing required by previous schemes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.105.042427

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such a concatenation requires entangling gates, which for GKP qudits can be realized with the same operations used for entangling GKP qubits.

    “Such a concatenation requires entangling gates, which for GKP qudits can be realized with the same operations used for entangling GKP qubits20,53–55.”

    From Quantum error correction of qudits beyond break-even (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, F., & van Loock, P.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2022-04-20
Volume
105
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
OpenAlex
W3207454018
Cited by
20
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code, quantum error correction, fault tolerance, syndrome measurement, stabilizer codes, concatenated codes, linear optics, continuous-variable quantum error correction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review