Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluctuation-dissipation theorems for classical processes

Deker, Uli, Haake, Fritz·1975·Physical Review A

Abstract

For certain types of classical processes a fluctuation-dissipation theorem (FDT) holds. The validity of such a theorem is preserved in each order of mass renormalization in the perturbation scheme recently developed by Martin, Siggia, and Rose (MSR). As a consequence, whenever the response function can be expressed in terms of the two-point correlation function via a FDT, the perturbation scheme of MSR simplifies considerably. Especially, it reduces to the scheme constructed by Kawasaki for random processes obeying detailed balance which are (i) linearly damped and (ii) linearly driven by Gaussian white noise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.11.2043

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Deker, U., & Haake, F.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1975-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
2043-2056
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073938013
Cited by
237
References
0
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluctuation-dissipation theorems for classical processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.11.2043
The paper
Deker, U., & Haake, F. (1975). Fluctuation-dissipation theorems for classical processes. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.11.2043

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.