The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amplitude squeezing in a semiconductor laser using quantum nondemolition measurement and negative feedback
Abstract
A new scheme for generating an amplitude-squeezed state is proposed. The photon-flux fluctuation of a semiconductor-laser output wave is measured with a quantum nondemolition (QND) detector, and is negatively fed back to the laser pumping current. The operator Langevin equations are derived by combining the quantum-mechanical analyses on the laser internal-external field fluctuations, the quantum nondemolition detector based on an optical Kerr effect, and a negative-feedback circuit. The output wave features a reduced photon number noise below the standard quantum limit, 〈(\ensuremath{\Delta}n^${)}^{2}$〉^〉, and an enhanced phase noise above that, 〈(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\psi}^${)}^{2}$〉>(1/4)〈n^${〉}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$, while the minimum uncertainty product is still preserved. The observed photoelectron statistics in a negative-feedback GaAs laser diode using a conventional p-i-n photodiode (not a QND detector) are shown to exhibit sub-Poissonian statistics with the variance 〈(\ensuremath{\Delta}n^${)}^{2}$〉apeq20.26〈n^〉. The measured photocurrent fluctuation spectral density is also indicated to be below the standard quantum limit by a factor of 0.2 (=-7 dB). The experimental results also confirm that such amplitude squeezing is only observed inside the feedback loop and cannot be extracted from the loop unless a quantum nondemolition detector is used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202
Theory of the linewidth of semiconductor lasers
Henry, C. (1982) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jqe.1982.1071522 · Cited by 2,488
Cited by
Quantum Measurement and Control
Wiseman, H. M., & Milburn, G. J. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813948 · Cited by 2,119
Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications
Zhang, J., Liu, Y.-X., Wu, R.-B., Jacobs, K., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.02.003 · Cited by 272
Sub-shot-noise correlation of total photon number using macroscopic twin pulses of light
Smithey, D. T., Beck, M., Belsley, M., & Raymer, M. G. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2650 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamamoto, Y., Imoto, N., & Machida, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1986-05-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3243-3261
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039345511
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amplitude squeezing in a semiconductor laser using quantum nondemolition measurement and negative feedback. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.33.3243
- The paper
- Yamamoto, Y., Imoto, N., & Machida, S. (1986). Amplitude squeezing in a semiconductor laser using quantum nondemolition measurement and negative feedback. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.33.3243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.