Experiment on nonclassical fourth-order interference
Abstract
A new fourth-order interference experiment has been carried out and analyzed theoretically in classical and in quantum terms. Two photons produced in the process of parametric down-conversion provide the two inputs to a Mach-Zehnder type of interferometer, while two photodetectors coupled to a coincidence counter measure the output. The coincidence rate, after subtraction of accidentals, exhibits a cosine variation with the optical path difference, in agreement with quantum mechanics, but in disagreement with a classical analysis. By contrast, when two coherent light beams from a He:Ne laser are used as inputs to the interferometer, no fourth-order interference is observed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because the N00N phase shift is double the value that would accumulate classically, it is highly sensitive to the environment.
“because the shift is double the value that would accumulate classically 33 it is highly sensitive to the environment.”
From Scalable on-chip quantum state tomography (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369 · see citing works
Self-citationObservation of nonclassical effects in the interference of two photons
Ghosh, R., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.1903 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
O'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.229 · Cited by 2,388 · see citing works
De Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state
Walther, P., Pan, J.-W., Aspelmeyer, M., Ursin, R., Gasparoni, S., & Zeilinger, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02552 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Manipulation of multiphoton entanglement in waveguide quantum circuits
Matthews, J. C. F., Politi, A., Stefanov, A., & O'Brien, J. L. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.93 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Scalable on-chip quantum state tomography
Titchener, J. G., Gräfe, M., Heilmann, R., Solntsev, A. S., Szameit, A., & Sukhorukov, A. A. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0063-5 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
II Quantum Phenomena in Optical Interferometry
Hariharan, P., & Sanders, B. C. (1996) · Progress in Optics · doi:10.1016/s0079-6638(08)70313-5 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ou, Z. Y., Zou, X. Y., Wang, L. J., & Mandel, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- ORCID
- Ou, Z. Y.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1990-09-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2957-2965
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1983840271
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Office of Naval Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- fourth-order interference, parametric down-conversion, Mach-Zehnder interferometer, coincidence counting, accidental coincidences, quantum interference, coherent light beams, He-Ne laser
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review