CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

Entangled entanglement

Krenn, Günther, Zeilinger, Anton·1996·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.54.1793
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In entangled systems values cannot be assigned to all quantum-mechanical observables of individual members of the system independent of the measurement context of the whole system. While various cases are known where properties like spin, momentum, energy, etc. can be entangled, entanglement itself is usually considered to be an objective property of the system. We show that situations can arise where this is no longer the case, and where therefore entanglement itself becomes an entangled property. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.54.1793

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The scheme in Fig. 15 also allows one to generate unconditional three-particle GHZ states via a method based on entangled entanglement.

    “The scheme in Fig. 15 also allows one to generate unconditional three-particle GHZ statesfoot_12 via a method based on the notion of entangled entanglement (Krenn and Zeilinger, 1996).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Krenn and Zeilinger, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krenn, G., & Zeilinger, A.
ORCID
Zeilinger, Anton
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1996-09-01
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
1793-1797
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.54.1793
OpenAlex
W4249205207
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 33 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
entanglement, quantum entanglement, measurement context, quantum observables, spin entanglement, momentum entanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review