The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment with relativistic massive particles
Open accessAbstract
Two aspects of the relativistic version of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB) experiment with massive particles are discussed: (a) a possibility of using the experiment as an implicit test of a relativistic center-of-mass concept, and (b) influence of the relativistic effects on degree of violation of the Bell inequality. The nonrelativistic singlet state average 〈\ensuremath{\psi}|a\ensuremath{\cdot}\ensuremath{\sigma}\ensuremath{\bigotimes}b\ensuremath{\cdot}\ensuremath{\sigma}|\ensuremath{\psi}〉=-a\ensuremath{\cdot}b is relativistically generalized by defining spin via the relativistic center-of-mass operator. The corresponding EPRB average contains relativistic corrections which are stronger in magnitude than standard relativistic phenomena such as the time delay, and can be measured in Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm-type experiments with relativistic massive spin- particles. The degree of violation of the Bell inequality is shown to depend on the velocity of the pair of spin- particles with respect to the laboratory. Experimental confirmation of the relativistic formula would indicate that for relativistic nonzero-spin particles centers of mass and charge do not coincide. The result may have implications for quantum cryptography based on massive particles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777
Penrose, R., & Rindler, W. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511564048 · Cited by 2,172
Pryce, M. H. L. (1948) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1948.0103 · Cited by 519
Zitterbewegung and the internal geometry of the electron
Barut, A. O., & Bracken, A. J. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.2454 · Cited by 280
Berry’s phase in the relativistic theory of spinning particles
Bialynicki-Birula, I., & Bialynicka-Birula, Z. (1987) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.35.2383 · Cited by 65
Barut, A. O., & Thacker, W. (1985) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.31.1386 · Cited by 58
Cited by
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Quantum information and relativity theory
Peres, A., & Terno, D. R. (2004) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.93 · Cited by 699
Quantum Entanglement of Moving Bodies
Gingrich, R. M., & Adami, C. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.270402 · Cited by 306
Quantum Entropy and Special Relativity
Peres, A., Scudo, P. F., & Terno, D. R. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.230402 · Cited by 290
Position and spin in relativistic quantum mechanics
Zou, L., Zhang, P., & Silenko, A. J. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032117 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Czachor, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-77
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1991337327
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment with relativistic massive particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.55.72
- The paper
- Czachor, M. (1997). Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment with relativistic massive particles. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.55.72
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.