Cited by 128Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsStrong Light-Matter Interactions

Quantum kinetic theory. II. Simulation of the quantum Boltzmann master equation

Open access
Jaksch, D., Gardiner, C. W., Zoller, P.·1997·Physical Review A

Abstract

We present results of simulations of a quantum Boltzmann master equation (QBME) describing the kinetics of a dilute Bose gas confined in a trapping potential in the regime of Bose condensation. The QBME is the simplest version of a quantum kinetic master equation derived in previous work. We consider two cases of trapping potentials: a three-dimensional square-well potential with periodic boundary conditions and an isotropic harmonic oscillator. We discuss the stationary solutions and relaxation to equilibrium. In particular, we calculate particle distribution functions, fluctuations in the occupation numbers, the time between collisions, and the mean occupation numbers of the one-particle states in the regime of onset of Bose condensation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.56.575

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In regimes whose properties are difficult to deduce by classical methods, many relevant models become hypersensitive to perturbations, and even small levels of noise may spoil completely the results of the quantum simulation.

    “In these regimes, however, many relevant models become hypersensitive to perturbations [145, 146], and even small levels of noise may spoil completely the results of the quantum simulation.”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [146]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaksch, D., Gardiner, C. W., & Zoller, P.
Affiliations
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
575-586
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W1982682321
Cited by
128
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Marsden Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
Keywords
quantum kinetic theory, Bose-Einstein condensation, dilute Bose gas, square-well potential, isotropic harmonic oscillator, stationary solutions, relaxation to equilibrium, particle distribution function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review