The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time optimal control in spin systems
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we study the design of pulse sequences for nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a problem of time optimal control of the unitary propagator. Radio-frequency pulses are used in coherent spectroscopy to implement a unitary transfer between states. Pulse sequences that accomplish a desired transfer should be as short as possible in order to minimize the effects of relaxation and to optimize the sensitivity of the experiments. Here, we give an analytical characterization of such time optimal pulse sequences applicable to coherence transfer experiments in multiple-spin systems. We have adopted a general mathematical formulation, and present many of our results in this setting, mindful of the fact that new structures in optimal pulse design are constantly arising. From a general control theory perspective, the problems we want to study have the following character. Suppose we are given a controllable right invariant system on a compact Lie group. What is the minimum time required to steer the system from some initial point to a specified final point? In nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and quantum computing, this translates to, what is the minimum time required to produce a unitary propagator? We also give an analytical characterization of maximum achievable transfer in a given time for the two-spin system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bulk Spin-Resonance Quantum Computation
Gershenfeld, N. A., & Chuang, I. L. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5298.350 · Cited by 1,528
Ensemble quantum computing by NMR spectroscopy
Cory, D. G., Fahmy, A. F., & Havel, T. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.5.1634 · Cited by 964
Cited by
Khaneja, N., Reiss, T., Kehlet, C., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., & Glaser, S. J. (2005) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.004 · Cited by 1,854
Self-citationNMR techniques for quantum control and computation
Vandersypen, L. M. K., & Chuang, I. L. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.1037 · Cited by 1,217
Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits
Cross, A. W., Bishop, L. S., Sheldon, S., Nation, P. D., & Gambetta, J. M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032328 · Cited by 704
Quantum control theory and applications: a survey
Dong, D., & Petersen, I. R. (2010) · IET Control Theory & Applications · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0508 · Cited by 601
Quantum Computation as Geometry
Nielsen, M. A., Dowling, M. R., Gu, M., & Doherty, A. C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1121541 · Cited by 539
Metadata
- Authors
- Khaneja, N., Brockett, R., & Glaser, S. J.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-02-14
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2147733222
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time optimal control in spin systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.63.032308
- The paper
- Khaneja, N., Brockett, R., & Glaser, S. J. (2001). Time optimal control in spin systems. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.63.032308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.