Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection devices in entanglement-based optical state preparation

Kok, Pieter, Braunstein, Samuel L.·2001·Physical Review A

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.63.033812

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximate number-resolving detectors can be created using only bucket detectors via detector cascading, with good fidelities when the number of modes is large compared to the average photon number and detector efficiencies are high.

    “On the other hand, we can create approximate number-resolving detectors using only bucket detectors via detector cascading.”

    From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Kok and Braunstein 2001

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. A. Peres, 1995, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
  2. M. H. Rubin, 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 022311, 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.022311 · DOI
  3. K. Vogel, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 1816, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1816 · DOI
  4. G. Harel, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 53, 4534, 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.4534 · DOI
  5. G. M. D’Ariano, 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 053817, 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.053817 · DOI
  6. M. Dakna, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 1658, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1658 · DOI
  7. A. Zeilinger, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3031, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3031 · DOI · Paper page
  8. S. L. Braunstein, 1998, Nature (London), 394, 840, 10.1038/29674 · DOI
  9. P. Kok, 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 042304, 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.042304 · DOI · Paper page
  10. C. W. Helstrom, 1976, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, 10.1007/BF01007479 · DOI
  11. S. Massar, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 1259, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1259 · DOI
  12. S. Massar, 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 062303, 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.062303 · DOI
  13. R. Deutsch, 1965, Estimation Theory
  14. C. A. Fuchs, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 53, 2038, 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2038 · DOI
  15. A. Peres, 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 022116, 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.022116 · DOI
  16. J. Kim, 1999, Appl. Phys. Lett., 74, 902, 10.1063/1.123404 · DOI · Paper page
  17. S. Takeuchi, 1999, Appl. Phys. Lett., 74, 1063, 10.1063/1.123482 · DOI
  18. S. Song, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 41, R5261, 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.5261 · DOI
  19. M. Reck, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 58, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
  20. H. P. Yuen, 1980, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 26, 78, 10.1109/TIT.1980.1056132 · DOI
  21. H. Paul, 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 2464, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2464 · DOI
  22. V. V. Dodonov, 1994, Phys. Rev. A, 50, 813, 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.813 · DOI
  23. V. V. Dodonov,, 1996, SPIE, 2799, 230, 10.1117/12.239835 · DOI
  24. V. V. Dodonov, 1984, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis., B, 83, 145, 10.1007/BF02721587 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kok, P., & Braunstein, S. L.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2001-02-14
Volume
63
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
Cited by
78
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review