Cited by 848Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions

Open access
Rungta, Pranaw, Bužek, V., Caves, Carlton M., Hillery, M., Milburn, G. J.·2001·Physical Review A

Abstract

Wootters [Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998)] has given an explicit formula for the entanglement of formation of two qubits in terms of what he calls the concurrence of the joint density operator. Wootters's concurrence is defined with the help of the superoperator that flips the spin of a qubit. We generalize the spin-flip superoperator to a ``universal inverter,'' which acts on quantum systems of arbitrary dimension, and we introduce the corresponding generalized concurrence for joint pure states of ${D}_{1}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{D}_{2}$ bipartite quantum systems. We call this generalized concurrence the I concurrence to emphasize its relation to the universal inverter. The universal inverter, which is a positive, but not completely positive superoperator, is closely related to the completely positive universal-NOT superoperator, the quantum analogue of a classical NOT gate. We present a physical realization of the universal-NOT superoperator.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.64.042315

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global Quantum Concurrence (CQ) as defined in Eq. (30) is widely used in this type of circuit and provides an approximation of the entanglement levels of qubit states for each execution and density matrix.

    “Eq. (30) is widely used in this type of circuit and provides an approximation of the entanglement levels of qubit states for each execution and density matrix [47], [52].”
  • Up to scaling, there is a unique operator satisfying the requirements for I-concurrence.

    “Up to scaling, there is a unique operator satisfying these requirements [67], namely”

    From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [67]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14][14] P. Rungta, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, P. Deuar, G. J. Milburn, C. M. Caves, In Directions in Quantum Optics: A Collection of Papers Dedicated to the Memory of Dan Walls, edited by H. J. Carmichael, R. J. Glauber, M. O. Scully (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000), pages 149-164. -
  2. [18][18] S. Yu, unpublished, e-print quant-ph/0001053 . · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rungta, P., Bužek, V., Caves, C. M., Hillery, M., & Milburn, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Hunter College (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2001-09-18
Volume
64
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2106985682
Cited by
848
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
FWCI
16.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
concurrence, entanglement of formation, bipartite quantum systems, arbitrary dimensions, quantum NOT gate, entanglement measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review