The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways
Open accessAbstract
We consider a single copy of a pure four-partite state of qubits and investigate its behavior under the action of stochastic local quantum operations assisted by classical communication (SLOCC). This leads to a complete classification of all different classes of pure states of four qubits. It is shown that there exist nine families of states corresponding to nine different ways of entangling four qubits. The states in the generic family give rise to Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-like entanglement. The other ones contain essentially two-or three-qubit entanglement distributed among the four parties. The concept of concurrence and 3-tangle is generalized to the case of mixed states of four qubits, giving rise to a seven-parameter family of entanglement monotones. Finally, the SLOCC operations maximizing all these entanglement monotones are derived, yielding the optimal single-copy distillation protocol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways
Dür, W., Vidal, G., & Cirac, J. I. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.062314 · Cited by 3,384
Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles
Briegel, H. J., & Raussendorf, R. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.910 · Cited by 1,950
Bell inequality, Bell states and maximally entangled states for n qubits
Gisin, N., & Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H. (1998) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(98)00516-7 · Cited by 270
Stimulated emission of polarization-entangled photons
Lamas-Linares, A., Howell, J. C., & Bouwmeester, D. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35091014 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401
The resource theory of quantum reference frames: manipulations and monotones
Gour, G., & Spekkens, R. W. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/3/033023 · Cited by 423
Scott, A. J. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.052330 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Verstraete, F., Dehaene, J., De Moor, B., & Verschelde, H.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2002-04-25
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2079320104
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.65.052112
- The paper
- Verstraete, F., Dehaene, J., De Moor, B., & Verschelde, H. (2002). Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.65.052112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.