Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum teleportation of light beams

Zhang, T. C., Goh, K. W., Chou, C. W., Lodahl, P., Kimble, H. J.·2003·Physical Review A

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.67.033802

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single-photon qubits have been teleported on atomic ensembles such as Caesium atoms, 87Rb atoms, a pair of trapped calcium ions, or diamond.

    “Single-photon qubits have been teleported on atomic ensembles [363,364] such as Caesium atoms [365] or 87 Rb atoms [366][367][368], on a pair of trapped calcium ions [369] or diamond [370].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [366]

    The Introduction and Conclusion describe this paper’s experiment as continuous-variable teleportation of optical fields, using squeezed beams and coherent-state inputs. That is contrary to attributing to it teleportation of single-photon qubits on atomic ensembles, trapped calcium ions, or diamond. The passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. A. Furusawa, 1998, Science, 282, 706, 10.1126/science.282.5389.706 · DOI · Paper page
  2. M.A. Nielsen, 1998, Nature (London), 396, 52, 10.1038/23891 · DOI · Paper page
  3. S.L. Braunstein, 2000, J. Mod. Opt., 47, 267, 10.1080/09500340008244041 · DOI
  4. S.L. Braunstein, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 64, 022321, 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022321 · DOI
  5. S.L. Braunstein, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 869, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.869 · DOI
  6. L. Vaidman, 1994, Phys. Rev. A, 49, 1473, 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1473 · DOI
  7. S.J. van Enk, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 60, 5095, 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.5095 · DOI
  8. P. van Loock, 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 62, 022309, 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.022309 · DOI
  9. E.S. Polzik, 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 3020, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3020 · DOI
  10. E.S. Polzik, 1992, Appl. Phys. B: Photophys. Laser Chem., B55, 279, 10.1007/BF00325016 · DOI
  11. E.S. Polzik, 1991, Opt. Lett., 16, 1400, 10.1364/OL.16.001400 · DOI
  12. H. Mabuchi, 1994, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 11, 2023, 10.1364/JOSAB.11.002023 · DOI
  13. L. Shiv, 1995, Opt. Lett., 20, 2270, 10.1364/OL.20.002270 · DOI
  14. Z.Y. Ou, 1992, Appl. Phys. B: Photophys. Laser Chem., B55, 265, 10.1007/BF00325015 · DOI
  15. Z.Y. Ou, 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 3663, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3663 · DOI
  16. S.J. van Enk, 2001, J. Mod. Opt., 48, 2049, 10.1080/09500340108240906 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, T. C., Goh, K. W., Chou, C. W., Lodahl, P., & Kimble, H. J.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2003-03-11
Volume
67
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
Cited by
235
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review