CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effective Hamiltonians for periodically driven systems

Rahav, Saar, Gilary, Ido, Fishman, Shmuel·2003·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.68.013820
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.68.013820

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to time-periodicity, the time-evolution operator can be factorized into Eq. (30) with a time-independent effective Hamiltonian and a kick operator.

    “However, due to the time-periodicity inherent to the system Ĥðt þ TÞ ¼ ĤðtÞ, this time-evolution operator can be factorized, leading to the more suggestive form (Kiss, Janszky, and Adam, 1994;Rahav, Gilary, and Fishman, 2003;Goldman and Dalibard, 2014;Bukov, D'Alessio, and Polkovnikov, 2015)”

    From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Rahav, Gilary, and Fishman, 2003

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. E.A. Cornell, 2002, Rev. Mod. Phys., 74, 875, 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.875 · DOI
  2. V. Milner, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 1514, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1514 · DOI
  3. N. Friedman, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 1518, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1518 · DOI
  4. P.L. Kapitza, 1951, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 21, 588
  5. W. Paul, 1990, Rev. Mod. Phys., 62, 531, 10.1103/RevModPhys.62.531 · DOI
  6. G. Schrage, 1995, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt., 7, 307, 10.1088/1355-5111/7/3/009 · DOI
  7. A.M. Perelomov, 1969, Sov. J. Theor. Math. Phys., 1, 275, 10.1007/BF01035742 · DOI
  8. T.P. Grozdanov, 1988, Phys. Rev. A, 38, 1739, 10.1103/PhysRevA.38.1739 · DOI
  9. M. Marinescu, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 53, 2513, 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2513 · DOI
  10. I. Vorobeichik, 1998, Europhys. Lett., 41, 111, 10.1209/epl/i1998-00117-6 · DOI
  11. P.F. Bagwell, 1992, Phys. Rev. B, 46, 15
  12. M. Wagner, 1997, Phys. Status Solidi B, 204, 382, 10.1002/1521-3951(199711)204:1<382::AID-PSSB382>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  13. M. Henseler, 2001, Phys. Rev. E, 64, 046218, 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.046218 · DOI
  14. B. Georgeot, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 4110, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4110 · DOI
  15. W. Magnus, 1954, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 7, 649, 10.1002/cpa.3160070404 · DOI
  16. M. Matti Maricq, 1982, Phys. Rev. B, 25, 6622, 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.6622 · DOI
  17. W.R. Salzman, 1987, Phys. Rev. A, 36, 5074, 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.5074 · DOI
  18. F.M. Fernández, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 41, 2311, 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.2311 · DOI
  19. O. Costin, 2000, J. Phys. A, 33, 6311, 10.1088/0305-4470/33/36/303 · DOI
  20. O. Costin, 2001, Commun. Math. Phys., 221, 1, 10.1007/s002200100455 · DOI
  21. A. Rokhlenko, 2002, J. Phys. A, 35, 8943, 10.1088/0305-4470/35/42/305 · DOI
  22. W. Li, 1999, Phys. Rev. B, 60, 15
  23. A. Emmanouilidou, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 033405, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033405 · DOI
  24. Y.B. Zeldovich, 1967, Sov. Phys. JETP, 24, 1006
  25. J.H. Shirley, 1965, Phys. Rev., 138B, 979, 10.1103/PhysRev.138.B979 · DOI
  26. H. Sambe, 1973, Phys. Rev. A, 7, 2203, 10.1103/PhysRevA.7.2203 · DOI
  27. W.R. Salzman, 1974, Phys. Rev. A, 10, 461, 10.1103/PhysRevA.10.461 · DOI
  28. F. Gesztesy, 1981, J. Phys. A, 14, L79, 10.1088/0305-4470/14/4/003 · DOI
  29. R. Englman, 1963, J. Math. Phys., 4, 105, 10.1063/1.1703876 · DOI
  30. I.I. Rabi, 1937, Phys. Rev., 51, 652, 10.1103/PhysRev.51.652 · DOI
  31. S.R. Barone, 1977, Phys. Rev. A, 15, 1109, 10.1103/PhysRevA.15.1109 · DOI
  32. I. Gilary, 2003, J. Phys. A, 36, L409, 10.1088/0305-4470/36/25/101 · DOI
  33. N. Moiseyev, 1998, Phys. Rep., 302, 211, 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00002-7 · DOI
  34. W. Scherer, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 1495, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1495 · DOI
  35. D. Daems, 2003, Phys. Rev. A, 67, 052505, 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052505 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rahav, S., Gilary, I., & Fishman, S.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2003-07-28
Volume
68
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.68.013820
Cited by
255
References
0
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review